|
Enjoy the full version online at http://www.gamegirladvance.com/archives/2002/12/01/halo_original_game_or_sequel.html
December 01, 2002
Halo: Original Game, or Sequel?
A year ago, when Halo debuted, I was playing some multiplayer Halo at a friend's house and recalled just how strikingly similar Halo was to Marathon: Bungie's previous installment of First Person Shooters. I remember being overwhelmed with a deja vu-esque sense that I was in fact playing a Rose that was going by another name, and made a mental note to eventually look into the matter. So I did some research, and came up with some fairly strong evidence to prove that it seems to be a very well done transfer of the Marathon legacy to the 3D gaming world. Why bother? Well, because as a fan of Marathon, I saw what an incredibly tight game Bungie had on their hands, and lamented the fact that nobody ever wanted to play a one of those "Mac games." By the responses I got, it seemed like I was asking them to do something immoral. To this day, many die-hard PC-only fanboys still scoff at the idea of Marathon. Can you blame Bungie for creating a sequel but changing the name in the interest of selling more titles? There were rumors of Marathon "easter eggs" throughout Halo, and I think there's something more to the following similarities than "easter eggs." Games like Duke Nukem which had homages to nearly every FPS that came before it (Doom, Dark Forces, etc) had easter eggs. Halo has what I would call an identity crisis. ::WARNING:: HALO SPOILERS FOLLOW ::WARNING::
The Marathon Logo.
It's seen in the game often enough for it to be almost persistent. The first place I noticed it was on the chest of Captain Keyes, the commanding officer of the Pillar of Autumn. This screengrab is from the opening cutscene, so you won't have to go very far in the game to see it for yourself. The Captain wears it here as if it's an emblem. Just as Star Trek officers wear the emblem of Starfleet on their chest, the Captain is seen here with the Marathon logo displayed proudly.
When looking for a website that discussed some of these rumored "easter eggs," I found a screengrab of the Pillar of Autumn, the capital warship you start out on in the beginning of the game (note: I'm not certain what part this screengrab is from, as the Pillar of Autumn isn't seen at this angle in the opening cutscene). While the logo is more hidden here among the geometry of the sihp, it's still displayed somewhat prominently (and largely), and towards the end of the game you can see it's mirrored on the opposite side of the ship as well.
Consider the bridge of the Halo itself. When the Master Chief walks out onto the gangplank for the first time, he's in the immense and expansive sphere shaped command center of Halo. The platform he's walking on extends and eventually intersects with a circular platform where the controls are located. I couldn't find any screengrabs that had a wide enough shot of the Halo control room, but if you look at the opening shot in the cinematic for that section, and imagine what it looks like from above, you can see that the negative space around the catwalk is the Marathon logo. Lastly, we have Exhibit A. The Halo logo itself. This is a larger version of the Halo logo which I nabbed off of Bungie's site, but it's the exact same as the smaller one depicted on the front of the game box. Look in the background, dead center, just between the A and the L. You can't miss it. I don't know why I didn't see it when I first picked up the box. The Marathon logo dead center in the Halo logo pretty much seals it for me. This title was meant to be Marathon.
It should be noted that both Marathon and Halo are nearly identical if one were to describe them to a friend: A First Person Shooter which involves the player using futuristic armor and weapons to defend the fate of the Earth and humanity itself from a hostile, unknown, alien civilization. The player is aided by an Artificial Intelligence onboard his ship, and can even use dropped alien weapons.
When I first saw Halo, we were playing it in Multiplayer mode. What I saw was a bunch of Master Chiefs in Mark V armor running around, and something about the whole experience struck me as very familiar. In Marathon, there were these characters who would show up from time to time to aid you in your quest. They were usually crew from the human ship you called home, and they were typically equipped with human weaponry. For whatever reason, be it their expendability or the fact that they all looked and sounded the same, they were nicknamed "Bobs." [Which turns out to mean "Born on Board." --b] By the time Marathon Infinity (the third Marathon in the series, and the one which most recently came out before Halo), the Bobs were upgraded to have armor (possibly Mark IV armor?) and a better pistol. Unfortunately I couldn't find a better screengrab on the net than these, but I think you can see how the Chief resembles a Bob all too closely.
Marathon's weapons all had a very distinct and recognizable look to them, and some of Halo's bear a striking resemblance. Of those, the pistol has a vaguely similar look and feel about it, and the assault rifle is positively straight out of Marathon. The only thing it's missing is the grenade launcher underneath it. Even the ammo countdown (where each individual bullet is displayed as it is expended) is incredibly similar to Marathon.
But the giveaway is in the rocket laucher. In Marathon, the players and fans of the game nicknamed the rocket launcher the "Spanker." It was a two-shot, two barreled rocket launcher (one above the other). The Halo rocket launcher is a double barrelled two shot rocket launcher, and has the letters "SPNKR" written on the side of it and the ammo cases found laying around the levels. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Marathon and Halo both sport witty chapter titles at the beginning of each chapter and sub-chapter. It's a small point, but it's another one to add to the growing pile.
In both games, you are instructed by the ship's sentient onboard computer. In the case of Marathon it's Durandal, Leela, and Tycho, and in Halo, it's by Cortana. The AI play a pivotal role in all four games; without them your cyborg hero would lack direction. One could even argue that the addition of a second, sinister AI (343 Guilty Spark) harkens back to Marathon Infinity when Tycho (the "evil" AI) tried leading your character astray.
Speed Worth noting is a sort of an unexplainable "zen" similarity between Marathon and Halo multiplayer: the speed at which you run. Considerably slower than any other FPS on the market, both games seem to move at a sim-like slow pace (compared to games like Quake and Unreal).
Marathon was probably the first FPS I had ever seen where they assigned a specific "death animation" to each way of dying. Of particular note was the rocket-launcher (or spanker) death, where the victim would fly through the air in an almost super-man like fashion flailing his arms and limbs, and upon hitting the ground, wall, or other solid surface, would turn into a pile of pink goo and bones. Sure enough, if you hit a group of people/characters with a grenade or rocket in Halo, the bodies go flying. You won't see this in many other FPSs. Typically the other games tend to "gib" the victims into pieces rather than waste engine processing power projecting a parabolic arc for the body to fly in.
This pretty much put the icing on the Halo = Marathon 4 argument for me. After taking the grand tour of Halo, and seeing all of the familiar hallmarks of a Marathon game, I explored the multiplayer game types. Marathon really expanded what "multiplayer" meant when it innovated the genre and came up with incredibly new and original game types to expand on the traditional deathmatch. While capture the flag was never an option in the original Marathon series, they came up with two types of deathmatch that are original to the Marathon franchise: Kill the Man With the Ball. Is it in Halo? Would I be writing about it if it wasn't? Kill the Man With the Ball was this incredibly fun game wherein the object was to capture a skull which was placed in the middle of the arena, and whoever was able to hold the skull the longest won, but with a catch. The player holding the ball could not run (only walk), and could not use any weapons. Finding it in Halo was like seeing an old friend you hadn't heard from in a few years. King of the Hill. No, it doesn't have anything to do with living in Texas. It's similar to KtMWtB, only now the winning player must stand in a designated zone longer than anyone else in the game. Standing in the zone doesn't nullify your weapons, but it does make you one hell of a target. Again, my heart sang when I found its welcome presence in Halo. The only other multiplayer games to ever even attempt these games was Goldeneye, so seeing Bungie carrying on the Marathon legacy is a sight for sore multiplayer eyes.
Research sources used: http://www.bungie.com Comments
im a PC person myself and have never played marathon(let alone ever touched a mac)...but all these lil thoughts could be true...could not be true..only Bungie knows but you seemed to have done quite a bit of good work on this...is almost convincing Sorry, but this isn't a convincing argument that Halo is any sort of sequel. Bungie certainly put in plenty of familiar treats for its Marathon fanbase, but saying that these make the game a sequel is ridiculous. Posted by: OoACoO on December 1, 2002 04:40 PMEverything you are saying is true and I agree with you that Halo should be called Marathon 4. Now what if Bungie ends the whole Marathon similarity thing right here and in Halo 2 no more easter eggs and that game is mainly dedicated to Halo. Then you can not call Halo 2 Marathon 5. I guess we will have to just wait and see if Halo 2 has no similarity whatsoever with the Marathon series, then you can truly call Halo the end of long running Marathon series. And HALO 2 the beginning of a new series for Bungie or should I say Halo. Posted by: HaloManiac87 (Kishan Patel) on December 1, 2002 04:46 PMEverything you are saying is true and I agree with you that Halo should be called Marathon 4. Now what if Bungie ends the whole Marathon similarity thing right here and in Halo 2 no more easter eggs and that game is mainly dedicated to Halo. Then you can not call Halo 2 Marathon 5. I guess we will have to just wait and see if Halo 2 has no similarity whatsoever with the Marathon series, then you can truly call Halo the end of long running Marathon series. And HALO 2 the beginning of a new series for Bungie or should I say Halo. Posted by: HaloManiac87 (Kishan Patel) on December 1, 2002 04:47 PMI came up with the same conclusion about the rocket launcher quite a long time ago. As for the game itself, I dunno man, I just don't, but what about the vechiles eh? Posted by: Xzilen on December 1, 2002 04:57 PMAll interesting points, but I am more in agreement with OoACoO; a sequel isn't defined by the similarities between it and it's predecessors, but by the story and setting. Although both Halo and Marathon have similar settings (much discussed on the HBO forums) they take place in two distinctly different periods - if not indeed entirely different "alternate" universes. From a more realistic point of view it makes far more sense for Bungie to create a new gaming universe than continue with that created for Marathon. Considering the elaborate interwoven plotlines in the Marathon series, to continue this with a new game will increase the complexity of the plot exponentially. Bungie have always tried to make the setting feel authentic and not self-contradictory. To carry on adding new interesting ideas (races, events etc.) to a game series whilst still keeping this consistency would be a huge task. So no, Halo isn't Marathon 4 - just a distant relative. Posted by: kapowaz on December 1, 2002 05:01 PMIt is an interesting read, but I don't think that Halo is Marathon 4, but I think it is a game that simply pays homage to those that have walked before it. I guess that the best comparison I have right off the top of my head is this: Relic Entertainment made Homeworld, a very innovative 3D RTS with a great story. Relic is about to release Impossible Creatures. I played the demo, and saw some very striking similarities between the two - namely they both try something seemingly Impossible and pull it off, both are great strategy games, and both use the same style of story telling, right down to the hand-drawn cinimatics. But both are different games, even though there are numerous similarites. So, Halo isn't marathon 4, but it merely pays respect to the games that have gone before it. Posted by: Raven on December 1, 2002 05:29 PMPoint of Information: marathon.bungie.org/story will have all your answers, er, i mean, more qusetions for you. its obvious that there are parrallels. . . they ARE made by the same company. and they have their fair share of continiuties (mark IV and Mark V armor, etc, etc.), and the same themes, its of course up to you to decide whether its all in the same maraverse, or parrellel universes (marathon infiity explored that one), or whether they are complete stand alone games. but its called halo b/c it has to do with a halo, the other one was called marathon b/cit had to do with a ship called marathon. =) so no, halo isn't marathon 4 b/c there is no marathon ship anywhere. and if you take the timelines given to us by bungie literally as the A.D. timeline, Halo takes place two hundred(?) years after the marathon laucnhes, but interestingly enough, one hundred years BEFORE the marathon games take place (the marathon floated through space for three hundred years before reaching its destination). what I want to know is why is the marathon symbol all over the Halo installation, the covenant , AND human. just more questions.. . . Posted by: Jager on December 1, 2002 05:42 PMDid you ever think that perhaps bungie just kept what it liked from Marathon. And as far as similarities in symbols weapons and so on i'm sure they did that on perpose. perhaps they were a little nostalgic ( don't call me on spelling i woke up 5 mins ago). To call Halo a sequel is rather absurd in my mind and probably anyone who has fallen into Halo's world aswell. Love this article and it makes some great points but Sequel NO. Hi, Halo a sequel, I think not! Haven't any of you read the book "Halo: The Fall Of Reach"? There is no Marathon ship, Bobs, or any Mark armors in Halo! Their armor is called MJOLNIR, not Mark V. That's a big difference. In Halo, Master Chief is a SPARTAN, not a Bob, and halo.bungie.org said that Bobs more closely resemble the Marines. Not to mention that Marathon has no UNSC, the Human forces, or Covenant, the alien forces. Also, Bungie wanted Marathon fans to see something to buy; by using the best game modes and the symbols only make Marathon fans who liked these things want to play a new game in itself. And the AI were important everywhere, although they never were evil except for 343 Guilty Spark. Bungie would rather draw in more fans and old ones, not just let all the Marathon fans get all the fun. Most importantly, Halo has Halo, Marathon has a ship, two different things, two different universes, two different games!!! Posted by: Blade on December 1, 2002 07:05 PMOk 1 worrd "Flood" Posted by: Diddy Mao on December 1, 2002 07:15 PMbungie wouldn't be ashamed to call it a marathon game if it's a marathon game, period. Posted by: jish on December 1, 2002 07:43 PMI can't believe I gave you enough credit to read all the way through this pile of shit. If you were a true Bungie fan you might just realize that maybe since Marathon was one of the titles that made Bungie, and the logo is unforgetable that it kind of a second call sign for them? And if you had ever even played a little of this game you would know both cyborgs have MJOLINIR armor. Did this not jump out at you? And then you think the inculsion of the game types is strange, hello if you invented them and they were a huge success, would you leave them out of a similar game? And you believe that because Bungie staff have an attention to details like realistic physics (a.k.a. possible speeds to run at, or explosions blast radiuses) that this is a be deal? Not to mention you left out thousands of similarites like the Hunters in Marathon with their green projecticles and blue armor on harder or higher up levels. So do some more research, you just might find out that their are a ton of similarites you missed, a ton that have no bases, and an even larger amount of new and differnent things. I am soo pissed that you would call this "research" that I am going to go play some Halo before I burst a vein. Satan, This has all been discussed very throughly before at the websites you got your info from, specifically The Halo Story page from HBO and the Marathon Story Page. If you were gonna call Halo another Marathon sequel (which at least story-wise it isn't), you should've gone as far to say that Halo was Pathways Into Darkness 5, and that Halo 2 was PiD 6. Posted by: archon on December 1, 2002 08:35 PMthe games are similar yes, but they are different stories. marathon is about a gigantic ship that has traveled to a near solar system or galaxy or something where they have encountered aliens. not to mention marathon happens further into the future than halo is reported to take place in. they certainly follow and use the same information. they are in the same "universe." marathon is more of a story of the character the aliens and the AI durandal. halo is more about the character vs the alien. i think marathon had a very rich storyline, halo doesnt. they both share stuff involving the forerunner. in the end i would say that halo and marathon are from the same larger story, but are stories by themselves. they are not sequals in any way shape or form. also "mjolner mark IV armor" was mentioned in marathon as it was in halo. the alien civilization in marathon was also similar in that it was more of a combination of races working together. the motiviations are different. marathon was about using humans as slaves. halo is about the destruction of the human race because of religion. marathon does use the same rocket launcher, the words on the side are the same. another difference is the ability to "jump" in marathon, this doesnt exist in halo. they are totally different games that are in the general sense, on the same storyline. i have to say though, you have obviously coppied your ideas from HBO and i think you should give them a bit more credit for basically supplying your entire article with facts. Posted by: gordonliu on December 1, 2002 09:33 PMCouple other similarities/things you didn't mention... 1. Both games feature a "post game carnage report" after a deathmatch. 2. The Marathon logo on the Pillar Of Autumn is more clearly visible in the cutscene right before The Maw 3. Both games feature motion trackers, rather than the radar typically found in sci-fi games. 4. Your character in Marathon IS equipped with Mark IV armor. 5. In an old build of Halo (on this video i've got showing tons of old builds, level editing etc) the assault rifle DOES have a grenade launcher attached. 6. In another old build, the circular designs on the door can be found in Marathon 2 on a level called "Waterloo Waterpark". That's it for now... but if I find anything else, I'll post it. Posted by: Kirby Smith on December 1, 2002 10:09 PMWho cares?! Posted by: Keith Schaefer on December 2, 2002 10:38 AMAnother forgotten thing: In "Halo: The Fall Of Reach" it proves that Master Chief is Human, not a robot or a cyborg. He is part of the SPARTAN project, where 150 cantidates are checked out to find 75 good cantidates. These people were taken a young kids, including someone named John 117. They were trained in battle tactics and strategies, and then were genetically modified, where only about 40 were left, only 30 of which were still suitable to fight. John 117 was appointed team leader after a great plan of taking out guards in a field practice, because the last person on the Pelican was to be left, so why not all get on at the same time? So John 117 became Master Chief, and over many years, mission after mission, until the actual fall if Reach, all of the SPARTANs were killed, leaving only Master Chief. Now that's nothing featured in Marathon, is it? Posted by: Blade on December 2, 2002 12:13 PMOMG! people keep saying, "Oh, they're so much alike!" Well, duh they're alike! they're made from the same company, Bungie! You need to look into Bungie before you say anything about Halo or Marathon. Posted by: dizzy dawg on December 2, 2002 01:43 PMI've never played marathon and I think since it is a lot like halo its a great game. But plot makes a sequel not eggs or similar design. Esp if its the same company. I mean do you go around saying that starcarft is the real warcraft 3. Also I may not have played marathon but bob stands for Born on Board. Posted by: Elmo on December 2, 2002 02:51 PMI've never played marathon and I think since it is a lot like halo its a great game. But plot makes a sequel not eggs or similar design. Esp if its the same company. I mean do you go around saying that starcarft is the real warcraft 3. Also I may not have played marathon but bob stands for Born on Board. Posted by: Elmo on December 2, 2002 02:51 PMI don't know if anyone who's posting comments is checking back for further comments, but to those of you who feel that a sequel (or for that matter prequel) is based strictly on plot and storyline, then what would you call Grand Theft Auto: Vice City? It takes place before GTA3, certainly, and has some familiar aspects to it (such as the radio station names), but the only character who makes a repeat performance is just a fringe character. So by your own definitions GTA:VC wouldn't be a prequel (or sequel as far as game engines are concerned), but it obviously is a prequel/sequel. I don't think anyone would argue that it isn't. Just food for thought. Ok the rocket is the only convincing part of all this. If not, it does not mean it's a Halo's prequel. The rest could have just been purposly done by bungie or a coinsidence. Posted by: 11d on December 2, 2002 04:44 PMEver think that the little bits and pieces that are reminicent of Marathon are for the benefit of those of us who have been playing Bungie games since 1994? You should really get more facts and information before actually posting something like this. Nevertheless, it's always nice to read something about a game created by my fave company (that would be Bungie... not Microsoft, though they aren't bad :-P ). Posted by: Lophan on December 2, 2002 05:24 PMjust as an aside, weren't bobs called 'bobs' because it was an anacronym for born on board? i seem to remember reading that in the orginal marathon manual. i sure hope someone ports if for os x someday. Posted by: henry on December 2, 2002 09:42 PMHalo and Marathon. Both awesome games made by Bungie. Halo has many things that are remenicent of Marathon, so that people who have played both (like me and many of you) can tell your friends who have not, "Hey, that's from Marathon. It's a great game from back in the day. Way ahead of it's time." They're just Easter Eggs, and Easter Eggs don't make a sequel. Hell, there's the music from Myth on "Assualt on the Control Room." Does that make Halo a sequel to Myth? Posted by: Nobody on December 2, 2002 09:44 PMWell, Halo is definitely not a sequel to Marathon. Its a prequel. A friend of mine even wrote a long essay on why the Master Chief is the same as the mysterious Cyborg protagonist of Marathon, and why it is possible that Cortana is Durandal, after going mad from information overload, or a prototype to Cortana. As well, Cortana and Durandal are both Charlemagne era swords- an important parrallel. As well, the Alien AI Thoth in many ways Parrallels Halo's own evil AI system. In any cases, chances are that the Jjaro of PID and Marathon fame made Halo, and that Halo 2 will induct us into deeper exploration of the Jjaro connection between Marathon and Halo. As far as the rocket launcher is concerned, a brief glance at any of the Marathon manuals reveals that EVERY missile launcher is a SPNKR variant. The variant in Halo is most likely the successor to those aboard the Marathon, which launched before the war. In any case, you should do some deeper research in the Marathon story pages. The story is incredibly vast. skye skyknyt, I think your friend is onto something with the idea that Halo is actually a prequel, and I love the whole sword name = AI bit (I seem to recall that being mentioned at HBO). I did in fact read the entire Marathon and Infinity story a few years ago over at marathon.org (I had just finished playing the Durandal single player at the time). It took me an entire day to read, but it was well worth it. Posted by: Bowler on December 3, 2002 08:34 AMI think you've definitely proved that Halo and Marathon take place in the same universe that Bungie has created for their games. Does it really matter if it's a sequel, prequel or two separate stories all together? Posted by: spaceghost on December 3, 2002 10:50 AMi don't know if you realize this, but the reason the gameplay is so slow is because the MC has really good reflexes, they make a huge point of it in the book Posted by: bob barker on December 4, 2002 04:39 PMwhile I don't dispute that marathon is a brilliantly crafted series and that Halo is nothng short of brilliant this does not alone prove the case that they are sequels. On sonic adventure for the dreamcast plenty of homage was paid to nights but was it a nights sequel - no. Hey skye, I want to read your friend's essay... Is it posted online anywhere? I love this post. I was (and still am) so pissed at Bungie for selling out to M$ that I have really refrained from going to any of their sites, or even doing any suplimental Halo reading -- even after I bought an x-box and halo on ebay. It's fun to think about the ways Marathon "lives on" in Halo. The kill-the-guy-with-the-ball game was one of my favorites. Coincidentally, just last night I was at a halo party... we had 4 x-boxes, and 14 of us spent about 5 hours shooting the hell out of one another. I think I even brought up Marathon at one point, (talking about a spanker-suicide map I'd made for it back in the day). But in 5 hours, we never played king of the hill, or the ball game. That's really one of the only things that I don't like about halo: that I can't create and/or download new maps for it. That, and using the stupid x-box controller. Posted by: grid on December 5, 2002 12:24 PMI'm surprised you didn't pick up on a big reference to Marathon early on in the game. In one of the first missions, when you are sent to rescue a squad of cut of marines you find them by a big structure, which you then use as a defensive position against the incoming enemies. Some of the marines freak out at this point, and you can hear some of them say "They're everywhere!" which is one of BOB's favorite phrases. Also, BOB stands for Born On Board, as in that person was born on board the ship. Posted by: SammyL on December 6, 2002 06:11 AMthis page should tell you all you need to know about marathon and halo occuring in the same universe: http://marathon.bungie.org/story/ of course it also has hundreds if not thousands of pages of a detailed analysis of what in my opinion is the greatesst plot ever to grace a videogame (that of marathon 1,2, ∞) also, lest people forget, myth was made by bungie more recently than marathon, and there arent any significant myth references in halo. let's just call halo a side story in the marathon universe and leave it at that :) Posted by: miles jacob on December 6, 2002 03:39 PMu know what? its good for u that u found all those similaritires. masterchiefs real name is john-117 NOT bob ur site sux with a capital K one more thing u cant compare the two, HALO rulz, tis all about HALO i think nothing can compare to halo.HALO RULES!!!! i agree totally with asswhooper.HALO RULES and marathon can suck balls Posted by: marathonSUX on December 7, 2002 10:00 PMThe skull, suit, and logo were the only things about Marathon convincing to me. What is the point though, ever FPS is based on something with resources from a previous shooter. Ever producer wants another hit but has to make sure it is just as bad as the first one. It's just like how rare created Perfect Dark or Goldeneye 2. Posted by: 007Justin on December 7, 2002 10:02 PMThe skull, suit, and logo were the only things about Marathon convincing to me. What is the point though, ever FPS is based on something with resources from a previous shooter. Ever producer wants another hit but has to make sure it is just as bad as the first one. It's just like how rare created Perfect Dark or Goldeneye 2. Posted by: 007Justin on December 7, 2002 10:04 PMbungie made all the marathon games so naturally their technicians are going to want to put the things they are used to handling into the game, maybe they wanted to meet the deadline and had to cut corners. I hear that is infact why they left alot of things like levels, extras, gun and vehicles etc..but hopefully we will see the true completed halo in halo 2. wether it is a sequel of marathon or not i dont care, it is a bloody excellent game providing me with hours of endless fun and the creaters are alright in my books, no matter where they got their ideas from. Posted by: Mark225 on December 8, 2002 08:17 AMJohn-117!? BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAA!..... no it aint Posted by: moo on December 8, 2002 09:06 AMactually his name is John-117! Try reading "Fall of Reach" Posted by: Jaakal on December 8, 2002 11:26 AMWhat's the point? Who cares? Not me. Halo is a great game no matter how bitter you are against PC gamers. Posted by: Chad Harrison on December 8, 2002 11:34 AMi though Halo was the first of its kind...... Posted by: MikeE on December 8, 2002 02:55 PMBAH! I say bah! I agree with the blokey. who gives a toss. just enjoy the bloody game. As for John-117, I couldnt care less what it said in fall of reach, as far as I am concerned I'm glad that they only refer to him as Master Cheif cause then anyone could be him. Posted by: moo on December 9, 2002 09:23 AMdude i totaly agree,but i think they made a new game with some of the same concepts.anyway i agree with the huge simalarity Posted by: Jim on December 9, 2002 03:32 PMI'd say you have a fairly valid argument, but in the big picture, does it matter? One minor point. Halo was an Xbox launch title, and so I doubt Microsoft and Bungie could easily call it "Marathon 4" without lots of people (read: idiots) wanting to know whether Marathons 1 through 3 were available on Xbox. And there hasn't been a new Marathon in quite a while, so it's more economical to just call it "Halo". Finally, why not re-use parts from your old games? Sure, its a cheap shot for people who know, but (and I hate to have to admit this) most people don't know what Marathon is. Is it recycling old concepts and artwork for use in a new game? Hell yes. Is that cheesy to do? Probably. But it's their game, and as long as the game is fun and playable, does it matter? Not really, as long as they progress each time a title comes out, and not just keep recycling the old stuff. Posted by: straylight on December 14, 2002 11:14 PMThe way I see it the connections are simply to spark interest and debate like this, because it's fun and interesting. It's kind of like how in the end of one of the predator movies (don't know which one, but this is what I've been told) it shows as a trophy, a head of a xenomorph, indicating its the same time era (this also spawned 3 alien versus predator games starting on the Snes hey duncan, one of the post also mentions a calico cat named jonesy, that was ripley's cats name, and it was predator 2 "but its called halo b/c it has to do with a halo, the other one was called marathon b/cit had to do with a ship called marathon. =) so no, halo isn't marathon 4 b/c there is no marathon ship anywhere." By your logic, Halo 2 isn't really the sequel to Halo, because Halo 2 takes place on Earth, not Halo or another Halo installation. Posted by: Bunnykun on January 1, 2003 08:37 PM"but its called halo b/c it has to do with a halo, the other one was called marathon b/cit had to do with a ship called marathon. =) so no, halo isn't marathon 4 b/c there is no marathon ship anywhere." By your logic, Halo 2 isn't really the sequel to Halo, because Halo 2 takes place on Earth, not Halo or another Halo installation. Since it takes place on Earth, should it be called Earth? Even if it was called "Earth" and not "Halo 2", it would definitly be the Halo sequel. Posted by: Bunnykun on January 1, 2003 08:38 PMThis is great, just like the old days when discussions about the Marathon plot raged on for thousands of pages! I think the Bungie folks realise just how compelling the original storyline for Marathon was, by being ambiguous they promote this kind of debate. I also think that Bungie were always great fans of the Mac and liked the idea of putting Marathon references into the Microsoft flagship game, kind of an insider joke for old Mac cronies. I like to think of Halo as some kind of prequel, The character is a cyborg (hence the first level name "Cyborgs and AI first") and could be the same character as the Marathon series. Also (on a slightly more anorak note) someone mentioned earlier that there was no UNSC in Marathon - but there was a UESC...and in the prolog for Marathon2 the cyborg character starts after spending 17 years "in stasis" - sound familiar? Posted by: Bones on January 10, 2003 09:16 AMFrom just reading the Halo novel, I noticed that there is a class of ships call Marathon-Class. Interesting, no? One thing Master Chief's first name is John !!! NOT BOB !!! Posted by: scott on January 20, 2003 04:19 PMOne thing Master Chief's first name is John !!! NOT BOB !!! Posted by: Scott on January 20, 2003 04:19 PMOne thing Master Chief's first name is John !!! NOT BOB !!! Posted by: Scott on January 20, 2003 04:19 PMOne thing Master Chief's first name is John !!! NOT BOB !!! Posted by: Scott on January 20, 2003 04:19 PMThis title, wasn't meant to be Marathon. Halo is Marathon. The name of the race that created Halo is the foreRUNNERs. Marathon, Forerunner. Hmmm... I believe that the sequels to Halo are intended to eventually tie the games together cohesively and unmistakably. I believe we will see some star wars type of revelations/surprises in the future Halo games. In the game Master Chief is referred to as the Reclaimer by 343 Guilty Spark and it is implied that Master Chief or individuals who looked like him had used Halo before. Born On Board. MC is awoken from cryo-stasis on the PoA at the very beginning of Halo. MC helps out and backsup the marines similar to the way the B This title, wasn't meant to be Marathon. Halo is Marathon. The name of the race that created Halo is the foreRUNNERs. Marathon, Forerunner. Hmmm... I believe that the sequels to Halo are intended to eventually tie the games together cohesively and unmistakably. I believe we will see some star wars type of revelations/surprises in the future Halo games. In the game Master Chief is referred to as the Reclaimer by 343 Guilty Spark and it is implied that Master Chief or individuals who looked like him had used Halo before. Born On Board. MC is awoken from cryo-stasis on the PoA at the very beginning of Halo. MC helps out and backsup the marines similar to the way the BOBs worked. Perhaps the original 150/75 candidates were the BOBs from Marathon and Master Chief is the last one alive many years later. Forerunner = Marathon Master Chief is born on board at the start of Halo. Posted by: John117 on January 25, 2003 05:02 AMsimple and easy, sorry Game girl advance writers, but someone beat you to your obvious punch. If you go to http://marathon.bungie.org/story/ it has all the information you put and more. There is strong correlative arguments that your character is the same Mjolnir Mark IV Cyborg which existed in Marathon and the same as Halo and if you look even further back, you can date it to Pathways into Darkness. Halo has millions of simlilarities, but I won't waste time writing them as they're already put down by Hamlish the writer of this website, just click on the halo section in the left half of the website once you enter. Sorry to kill this thread with proof ;). Also, to kinda put down those arguments that the master chief is a BOB or the same cyborg you play in Marathon. The master chief was said to be put together on the planet that the Pillar of Autumn hailed from. If you go into Marathon and read up, you find out that two asteroid planets got into a huge war between each other, sorry, but i forget the names, but in this war, the two sides manufactured the first "battle roids" and these were placed in battle and quickly killed everybody. I can't put my finger on a correlation between this and Halo though, as the asteroid planets cannot be the same as the one the master chief came from, but it looks like it was possible that the same technology was put together and mabye the body of the old cyborg soldier you were was arisen again by this technology after being found ?floating in space? But I need to read up on the end of marathon Infinity, because that was the last in the series, but i remember that in the end of Marathon 2: Durandal, the character and Durandal are rumored to have escaped the end of the universe and become gods, so mabye Halo was just meant to be a better/different/more recent/more mass marketed version of marathon? Because marathon didn't sell as well, but had a very devoted fan base such as people like me and you all reading this. Posted by: Marathon Owns All on January 28, 2003 05:56 PMsorry for a THIRD post, but just have to say this: Halo and Marathon were both based on different sci fi books, but there are similar ties between them, which means could they be just different generations of "battle roid" Mjolnir Mark IV Cyborgs? halo was based on a book by Ian M. Banks called Culture and another one by him called Consider Phlebas, which are both excellent books and even the cover has Halo on it. Marathon was based on the book, Marathon by Alexander Smith, both should be bought post haste if you want to understand the backgrounds of both. Posted by: Marathon Owns ALL on January 28, 2003 06:01 PMoh wow holy crap i didn't think about this one, but the forerunner could be the alien pfhor ship that Durandal comandeers and takes across the Galaxy because as one point in the game it shows how Durandal went around the galaxy with his new warp drives and he meets up with you again in Marathon 2 Posted by: Marathon Owns All on January 28, 2003 07:50 PMand no, master chief is not BOB on the Pillar of Autumn, BOBs are second or any following generation of children born on a starship and that's the name they get. You wouldn't be called Master Chief but BOB and you aren't born, just brought out of stasis Posted by: Marathon Ownz ALL on January 28, 2003 07:52 PMwho cares? if they're both good games, forget about it and just enjoy them! Posted by: wow on February 6, 2003 03:40 PMmarathon owns all...what can i say... MASTER CHIEF WAS NOT "BORN" ON THE SHIP! he is a cybernetically advanced HUMAN...
Does it really matter if it is sqeual? I mean it is pretty cool that the DEVs for this game through in all this stuff and it probally was ment to be a sqeual in its early stages of planing but do you really think the name Marathon 4 would have sold to the XBOX gamers who at the time were looking foward to new, fresh and original titles. Halo was like th only micorsoft only on xbox, for xbox, design by XOBX, to make xbox what it is game. Would have this game really drawn in the crouds? I mean it would have been seen a add on to an almost dead series. Sorta like peoples take on the plans for tribes 3. I am just glad they made the gmae and am really happy to see that the programers (DEVs) took the time to add in these little reminders of Halos heritage in the gaming world. Posted by: RazorSkin on February 12, 2003 12:04 AMTrue if you read the HALO books it is clear. Masta Cheif was born and is an enhanced person. I won't say human because they didn't make that clear. He comes from another world then earth. He is also the last of his class of powersuit enhanced warrior. Posted by: True on February 12, 2003 12:07 AMto "..." The Covenet Symbols in the ship are the same as the marathon logo. Posted by: Razor on February 16, 2003 01:10 PMWow, I can't believe this is even a debate. Someone else pointed out the Marathon logo's presence within the Halo logo years ago, when Halo was first demoed on a Mac G3 at Macword. In an interview, Jason Jones (lead programmer and cofounder of Bungie) mentioned that there were "common threads" running throughout all of Bungie's games. The example he mentioned at the time was that in an earlier game of theirs, Minotaur (1992), the character can find a sword named Durandal. I doubt the question "is Halo a sequel" matters. Bungie works common elements into their games. waka Posted by: waka on February 21, 2003 04:41 PMOK, that's it. I am now refering to Halo as "Marathon 4". No one will know what the hell I'm talking about, but hopefully it'll relieve a little of the anger I have that there is no and never will be a Halo for Mac. Posted by: Kyle Thompson on February 21, 2003 10:07 PMThis hole Strand got me very interested in delving deeper into this issue. And I found some very interesting things. First I went to compare Timelines here's what I found: Also In the Marathon timeline it says "c.-6.4E07 (-60,000) Unnamed 'God' crashes on the Yucatan Peninsula in southeastern Mexico." And in the Fall of Reach timeline it says " 2512 A geological survey team on Sigma Octanus IV finds rocks with odd compositions - these were introduced from meteor impacts roughly 60,000 years ago" Both 60,000 years ago. Interesting no? I have just begun my research so I'm sure I will find more interesting tie ins later. Posted by: Chris on February 24, 2003 08:44 PMNice job chris. Keem em coming! Posted by: Marathon Ownz ALL on February 26, 2003 07:26 AMMy only reservation to thinking that Halo is the unofficial sequel is a bit of a technology lapse. In Marathon, there were obviously star-trek-like-transporters. BOB's transported in to help you out. In Halo, no there are no such things. Of course, you could argue that the transporters are located on the Pillar of Autumn and therefore could not be used at all, BUT the Halo novel makes absolutely no reference to any such device. I think there may have been another technology lapse that made gave me doubts, but that's the main one. Posted by: Bunnykun on March 3, 2003 08:57 PMWow, I never thought of that one, good job. It's pretty obvious when you think about it. But the big, BIG, thing we're missing, is the AI. Sure we have cortana and she's all good and all, but she isn't like the AIs out of Marathon who control different portions of the ship. Also the transporters...you SHOULD have them on PoA, but you don't. There are transporters though, and Cortana and the 343 Guilty Spark use them to transport you in different levels such as "343 Guilty Spark" and well...i forget the other one, but Cortana sends you in upside down because she's getting the hang of the transporters. Actually there shouldn't necessarily be Teleportation technology in Halo. Halo is a prequal to Marathon, so Marathon is farther into the future. Posted by: Chris on March 13, 2003 08:23 PMYou can get a wide shot of the control room quite easily...... You do it late on in the game, after you use the plasma pistol to shoot down the 4 sentinels and when you clear all the covenent and get out side, you make your way down the pyramid. You then get into a Bamshee....you then fly back on yourself into the pyramid and into the control room, now fly up and look down on control room from above. E A S Y. As for your comparisons, I never played with a Mac before so I can't say, but old references to other stuff is always cool in my books. Posted by: James on March 14, 2003 05:47 PMThe rocket launcher was actually *called* the SPNKR in Marathon: Durandal and Infinity, wasn't it? I get so pissed when I see most-influential-games-lists claim Quake or Duke Nukem as being the games that brought 3D to first person shooters. I was fragging my friends on 6100s local-talked together years before Quake came about. Posted by: Andrew White on March 19, 2003 10:57 AMActually, Cortana can control many parts of the ship, according to the Halo novel. From what I remember, Cortana can control the weapons and lay down an effective defense, can navigate, and do start up procedures. . .she pretty much has the run of the ship. In fact, all ships in the fleet had an AI. The Pillor of Autumn is unique in that is had two AI's, it's normal AI and the much more advanced Cortana, who was really developed as a supplement to the Spartan she (Cortana) chooses. Posted by: Bunnykun on March 28, 2003 07:50 PMya i noticed the name "Foehammer" in marathon a while ago too Posted by: Cody on March 31, 2003 08:23 PMHalo might have some relations like the emblems and the suit but i agree HALO IS NOT ANOTHER MARATHON really marathon got very old very fast
Between the "A" and the "L," I see an "O" in that logo. Halo is EVIL, I tell you. Posted by: Punchie on April 2, 2003 07:10 PMI don't know if anybody said this already, but Cortana is Durandal's counterpart sword. Charlesmagne had Durandal, his cousin had Cortana. Halo also takes place some 3~400 years before Marathon. Plenty of time for the Flood, etc, to die and for Sph't and P'fhor to come around. However, Halo is not Marathon 4. If anything, it's the prequel. It's like Command and Conquer and Red Alert. RA is the prequel to C&C, Marathon being C&C with Halo being RA. Posted by: Arkhain on April 3, 2003 03:34 AMThere are a lot of similarities, yes, but not having played Marathon I can't say one way or the other. However, you did kind of push out the fact that nearly all FPS games have some sort of King of the Hill. Perfect Dark for the N64 has both a King of the Hill and a Capture the Case mode, where the object is to hold a briefcase for the longest. Unreal also has the Domination mode, where your team has to capture a specific location, and hold it for a set amount of time to earn points. It's also important to point out that games include fan throwbacks all the time. In Perfect Dark, the guns from GoldenEye are displayed in the Weapons Testing area of the agency office. Posted by: Malachai on April 3, 2003 03:35 AMEveryone who is saying no are you stupid Halo is not a sequel blah blah blah, is retarded. You should play both games before you make such an article blah blah blah of course they played both games or otherwise they wouldnt have any time of premise or basis for comparsion, also never once in the article does it say Halo is a sequel to marathon. The whole article poses the question is it a sequel? Some smart people have said no its not and these are the reasons but most people dont use their brains and just rant about how there no way that it is and have no support evidence. Maybe you all should take time to READ the article before ranting. Posted by: zeroxerozero on April 6, 2003 01:31 PMAccording to the Myth: The Total Codex production journal, Bungie stopped production on Marathon 4 to make Myth. Marathon 4 was going to be a 3D installment of Marathon. Wether or not the story was going to follow the others is not reported. Most likely the work they did for Marathon 4 evolved into Halo. If anyone running Windows wants to check out Marathon, Marathon 2 was ported, and the demo can be downloaded for free. You might want to check bungie.org if you're curious. Posted by: isthaq on April 10, 2003 12:52 PMI wouldn't call Halo a sequel per se, it seems pretty obvious it's supposed to be it's own game. But I was long ago convinced that it takes place in the same universe as Marathon. As somebody mentioned, the very interesting gap in the timeline of Marathon corresponds very nicely with the Halo timeline. The player in both games can't be the same person, because while Halo is taking place, the Marathon is en route to Tau Ceti, and for this same reason it also means that Durandal and Cortana cannot be the same AI. However, it is widely accepted that the player in Marathon is a Mjolnir Mark IV Cyborg. The similarities to this that turn up in Halo are too much to dismiss out of hand. They both certainly seem to be the same kind of entity. After the first Marathon game, Durandal whisks the player off to Lh'owon in a stolen Pfhor ship. By the time he arrives there, in 2811, not only is the player halfway across the galaxy from any Halo-related events that may be occurring, it's also around 300 years later to boot. To me, this explains why there might not be much correlation between Halo and the events in the second and third game. Posted by: Joyeuse on April 10, 2003 01:49 PMWell then, I suppose I could start out saying that I'm a big fan of Halo and that when I had a Mac a few years ago I played a little Marathon and loved it. It's kinda wierd, I'd actually forgotten about it until I read this and it gave some sort of crazy flashback/seizure due to the sudden realization that you were talking about "the" marathon (the first screenshot really did it for me)I don't really see why there's a debate over who's who. And what game is a sequel to what. Most annoying are the few who have posted that haven't played both games, you know who you are......(they like to scream "halo rules!" and usually have nothing worth saying) anyways, I would describe this thread as "Being riddles with pointless bickering and hoobjabbering with occasional bursts of piercing logic and rational creative thought." well, now that u mention it, yeah, id have to agree with you. but ten again, witt he timeline of Marathon and Halo, would u call it a Sequel or Prequel? i mean, in Halo they have the more advaced Tech but the Marathon was launched 200 years years before Halo, so that could b the reason for that. as for manyof the people here who just cant accept the possibility, i think most o the jus dont want to admit that they would like anything that should be bearing the Marathon name Posted by: Stephen on April 10, 2003 07:07 PMoh, and just a note to Malachai, the Briefcase game in Perfect Dark was not King of the Hill or anything like it. much more akin to the KtMWtB game. only real dif being the ability to run and use weapons. King of the Hill is a lot diferent, and personally, i think its a hell of a lot more fun. Posted by: Stephen on April 10, 2003 07:13 PMand teh last note.. i swear.. is that the placement of the Marathon symbol scarily enough makes it AOL so yeah Posted by: Stpehen on April 10, 2003 07:49 PMYou put up a fairly good arguement and I was almost convinced. But reading up on the stories of both I would say that it was just Marathon reverences thrown into the game as something some people would get. But calling it a sequel because of an Easter Egg would be like calling Dukem Nukem a sequel to Doom because the Doom character makes an appearance. Now that I think of it though...doesn't the guy from the Doom and Quake games look eerily like the guy from Halo? Posted by: FrostByte on April 11, 2003 10:45 AMLook at Final Fantasy games. Different worlds, same names, places, music (even a character named Cid). You really can't blame bungie for using some logos, and names from a previous project. By the way, Halo IS the best FPS game ever created. Nothing can change that. Posted by: A-O on April 11, 2003 04:07 PMMarathon was one of the first computer games I ever played, and I played a lot of it. A friend had a small LAN in his house and we would play Marathon for hours. I would have to agree that HALO is just a logical sequel to the whole Marathon series. Too bad Microsoft snatched it up in an effort to aid the Xbox. Posted by: Chris on April 12, 2003 02:44 PMYes, Stephen, that was my point. All the games these days have a KotH/KtMWtB form of play. Posted by: Malachai on April 13, 2003 05:40 AMya missed an obvious one. Marathon logo on its side in the 'O'. Bobs are Born On Board's. Posted by: Talos on April 14, 2003 12:42 AMThe graphic on the main page that links to this Spin-off. Not a sequel, a spin-off. Posted by: Elerrawyn on April 16, 2003 07:58 PMMicrosoft should burn in hell for buying Bungie and ruining their original vision for Halo. Theres your proof it wasn't a Marathon sequel right there. If you had been to the Halo site like I had many times before Microsoft bought Bungie you'd know that Halo was actually intended to be, well... Planetside. That was their original vision. Maybe not the massive multiplayer part of it, max of 64 people per game more likely. I can't remember exactly but I dont think it was even supposed to be a FPS, more like 3rd, I can't be exact on that due to all that info has been erased from their site since Microsoft bought it and told them "We need this game out soon, just make it a FPS" then decided to rush Bungie, which is why the game is the same damn levels going in as it is coming out. But it was supposed to be a game with huge battle areas lots of people, the same Vehicles they have in Halo, but lots LOTS more like Planetside. Screw you Microsoft, Screw you. Posted by: Droch on April 17, 2003 04:58 PMY'know, there's a ton of people that go on and on about this stuff at halo.bungie.org Things here that, if you don't know anything about Marathon, like me, will completely blow your mind. Posted by: Patrick on April 17, 2003 09:40 PMCheck out one of the real "Master Chiefs"...(maybe the name is Bungie's little commentary on Navy vs. Marines?).. http://www.cnrc.navy.mil/regionnorth/newengland/cmc.htm Posted by: Checkthisout on April 18, 2003 01:08 AMIf you haven't been priveliged enough to have a Mac, Aleph One(based off official Marathon 2 opensourced code) should let you play on Windows or Linux. They have demo files converted to PC formats as well. The current screenshot for today looks as if it can only get better... Posted by: J Nimmo on April 18, 2003 01:51 AM(Responding to Droch's post) Hopefully, Halo 2 will fit Bungie's original vision better. I've got some preview movies of Halo from before MS bought Bungie, and they're quite different from the final game. Regarding the similarities, there are undeniably ties between Halo and Marathon, just as there are ties between Marathon and Pathways into Darkness (check out bungie.org, if you haven't already). As to why Bungie didn't call the game Marathon 4, first, it's a totally different storyline, and set at a different time, even if it's related and set in the same universe. Second, Bungie had (they used to, I don't know if it's still there) a page on their web site regarding Marathon 4. It said something like this: There's a painting in the Bungie offices. In the painting are a group of people, Bungie employees IIRC, surrounding a dead horse, kicking it. Upon closer examination, a label is seen on the horse: Marathon 4. Posted by: Sirius on April 18, 2003 03:42 AMMaybe Halo is a prequel to the Marathon series? And maybe that's why all the races are seen with the Marathon symbol because Bungie will eventually all tie it in to the Marathon series. Or bungie could just be having fun to see if the fanbase gets the allusions =) Hell, that's what I would. Most companies do that anyhow with different games. Posted by: Me on April 18, 2003 12:31 PMi don't understand the hype surrounding halo; there wasn't anything very groundbreaking or terribly exciting about it. sure, it was fun but not to warrent so much attention. Posted by: thom on April 18, 2003 03:57 PMThats exactly what I mean J, if you watch those videos, the game was completely different, I was extremely excited with the direction bungie was going to take a Battlefield type game... then Microsoft... bleah... Posted by: Droch on April 18, 2003 05:47 PMThats exactly what I mean J, if you watch those videos, the game was completely different, I was extremely excited with the direction bungie was going to take a Battlefield type game... then Microsoft... bleah... Posted by: Droch on April 18, 2003 05:47 PMI'm Bak again. Why does cortana say "If I still had fingers, they'd be crossed. " This implies she was once human, or that she used to be a cyborg or something. Any suggestions? Posted by: Marathon OWNZ all on April 20, 2003 02:45 PMmmm... marathon. Maratho OWNS all, cortana is an AI who is an exact copy of Dr. Catherine Halsey, who was killed when Reach fell. You can find out more by reading "The Fall of Reach." Posted by: Flood Fighter on April 26, 2003 09:35 AMWhy the hell do u hav 2 go n make up these stories 4 me it just ruins the originality and amazing gameplay dat Halo is. U shoud be prazing it as a game not as somethin it msy or may not hav intended to be. Is it a great game... Yes, then who carse if it was a sequel its just as good either way!!! Posted by: Dante on May 17, 2003 08:53 AMThis is the type of discussion that gives the hardcore fans their legitimacy. But it's really boring to read and frankly, who cares? What is it with people and their perpetual arguments about the cockpit dimensions of an X-Wing or some other sci-fi related issue? How about the suggestion that these imaginary worlds aren't set in stone and oftentimes very much related? Do you know what a format is? Posted by: dzeroo on May 19, 2003 03:53 AMI've never played Marathon, but I am aware of the similarities between the two, and what caught my eye while readign the book was "Marathon-class" Cruiser, the largest ships in the UNSC fleet. I think. Posted by: PhoenixRisen on May 20, 2003 11:03 PMI've never played Marathon, but I am aware of the similarities between the two, and what caught my eye while readign the book was "Marathon-class" Cruiser, the largest ships in the UNSC fleet. I think. Posted by: PhoenixRisen on May 20, 2003 11:04 PMYou made a coment about Master Chief's name is Bob. I don't know if you are serious or just making a point but if you read the fall of reach, master chief's real name is John. Posted by: Zapman on June 16, 2003 08:52 PMGuys i think that bungie simply put that stuff in so fans of marathon could go "oh, oh that was in marathon" i know that i have played several games by the same companies and noticed references from other games i.e. Sacrifice the company that makes earthworm jim made a game called sacrafice with gods and stuff and the god of earth was james and he was an earthworm and i was like "oh, oh earthworm jim thats awesome." and i felt really smart for knowing it so maybe they put that stuff in so that you would feel cool for noticing it. Posted by: Zinkman1231 on June 19, 2003 10:27 PMthe first sacrifice in my post should be shiny Posted by: zinkman1231 on June 19, 2003 10:39 PMi think all of you guys except for satan are complete and total jackasses for even trying the game halo to any of the marathon games its cooler sleeker has beter graphics and not to mention if any of you idiots have not noticed the xbox controler was almost completely designed just for halo i dont know how any of you are so stupid as to not realize it but not only that but this game was the xbox primary flagship game marathon didnt have a hole system and controller layout made for it not to mention that halo got the rating of best game of the year by over1million newspapers and magazines the world over and you can tell that bungie spent more time on the storyline and oops i ment to put compare inthe first sentence of thepost i aplyed there so justput that in your head instead of trying P.S. the KKK says yalll suck and im right Halo was originally written for the Mac. Micro$oft bought Bungie while halo was 40/50% complete. Thus stopping such a great game coming to a rival OS. Plus they actually had a decent game for X-box, so they could actually sell the consoles as soon as they were released, rather than hoping some one would make a decent game off there own backs, which so wouldn't happen in time for the console to survive. It was very good marketing on Micro$ofts behalf. They even promised that the mac version would not be delayed, but it never even made it to the mac. Posted by: T123 on July 2, 2003 09:36 AMWell, maybe they ran out of ideas. But Halo was suppose to be a RTS game at first. Then it turned into the FPS it is today. Interesting article... Posted by: notabeliever. on July 10, 2003 12:40 AMWell, maybe they ran out of ideas. But Halo was suppose to be a RTS game at first. Then it turned into the FPS it is today. Interesting article... Posted by: notabeliever. on July 10, 2003 12:40 AMWell, maybe they ran out of ideas. But Halo was suppose to be a RTS game at first. Then it turned into the FPS it is today. Interesting article... Posted by: notabeliever. on July 10, 2003 12:40 AMHe's got a few things wrong about Marathon, but some good points in general. The Marathon logo is, in the Marathon game, the logo of the UESC, or (I believe) the United Earth Space Corps. Marathon VacBOBs aren't wearing Mk IV armor, but the Player is a Mjolnir Mk IV cyborg. Also, the fans didn't name the rocket launcher spanker, Bungie did. However, I don't think Halo was meant to be a "sequel". It could be placed in the same universe (called the Maraverse by some) in a different time. Posted by: Raptor007 on July 13, 2003 04:41 PMits long been known that halo is set in the same universe as marathon, i knew that before halo came out, it was mentione din practically every priview and review around the release Posted by: milk on July 15, 2003 12:41 AMDid you ever consider the possibility that Bungie was perhaps referencing its past success for those who were around to see it? I hate to say it, but Mac gaming was and is still a bit of a niche market - not a whole lot of folks played the Marathon titles. For a casual fan who comes to H.A.L.O. unaware of other games, stuff like the symbols, "Spanker", and whatnot are just neat little touches for the universe. And for the hardcore fans who flame each other over whether or not the name of the armor was "MJOLNIR", Bungie tossed in those things to say, "Hey, remember this?" Posted by: Mr Timby on July 15, 2003 10:30 AMExcellent observations, but while were on the topic we might as well call MYTH:TFL the prequel to marathon/halo because it shares the same types of small eastereggs/nitpicks. "FROG BLAST THE VENT CORE" anyone? "SMELLS LIKE NAPALM,TASTES LIKE CHICKEN" -KT Posted by: KingTalo on July 16, 2003 07:37 AMOh, yeah almost forgot. The rocket launcher from M1-Minfinity was also called the SPNKR. I've never heard of it referred to as the spanker myself. Now all they need to do is make the 'Zeus Class Fusion pistol' for halo 2 (and while we're at it throw in some S'PHT, Jjarro, and Pfhor and we'll have a full fledged sequel. PS- Halo also has roots from an excellent book (series) called 'Ringworld' by Larry Niven. Great Read! Posted by: KingTalo on July 16, 2003 07:43 AM"Microsoft should burn in hell for buying Bungie and ruining their original vision for Halo. Theres your proof it wasn't a Marathon sequel right there. If you had been to the Halo site like I had many times before Microsoft bought Bungie you'd know that Halo was actually intended to be, well... Planetside. That was their original vision. Maybe not the massive multiplayer part of it, max of 64 people per game more likely. I can't remember exactly but I dont think it was even supposed to be a FPS, more like 3rd, I can't be exact on that due to all that info has been erased from their site since Microsoft bought it and told them "We need this game out soon, just make it a FPS" then decided to rush Bungie, which is why the game is the same damn levels going in as it is coming out. But it was supposed to be a game with huge battle areas lots of people, the same Vehicles they have in Halo, but lots LOTS more like Planetside. Screw you Microsoft, Screw you." I S'PHT ON YOUR GRAVE M$!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS KID JUST REACHED PUBERTY, "i think all of you guys except for satan are complete and total jackasses for even trying the game halo to any of the marathon games its cooler sleeker has beter graphics and not to mention if any of you idiots have not noticed the xbox controler was almost completely designed just for halo i dont know how any of you are so stupid as to not realize it but not only that but this game was the xbox primary flagship game marathon didnt have a hole system and controller layout made for it not to mention that halo got the rating of best game of the year by over1million newspapers and magazines the world over and you can tell that bungie spent more time on the storyline and
THIS KID JUST REACHED PUBERTY, "i think all of you guys except for satan are complete and total jackasses for even trying the game halo to any of the marathon games its cooler sleeker has beter graphics and not to mention if any of you idiots have not noticed the xbox controler was almost completely designed just for halo i dont know how any of you are so stupid as to not realize it but not only that but this game was the xbox primary flagship game marathon didnt have a hole system and controller layout made for it not to mention that halo got the rating of best game of the year by over1million newspapers and magazines the world over and you can tell that bungie spent more time on the storyline and
I've got some criticism for some of the critics here: Don't criticize an article until you've read it. If you have read it, but find yourself unable to comprehend it, go get an education, then post. This article was well-formatted, well-researched, and posted for YOUR edification and consideration. The author has obviously played both games (as explicitly stated in the article) and has visited the official Bungie (and other) websites pertaining to both games (as explicitly stated and linked to in the "resources" section). The similarities presented go well beyond the persistent Marathon logo and graphical similarities. I do, however, agree with those who testify that Halo is not a true sequel, but rather a new game in the distinctive tradition of the Marathon series. Posted by: Simon Magus on July 16, 2003 11:10 AMjust my personal opinion but i simply think that bungie are just paying an homage to their previous games. Okay. Saying Halo is a Marathon sequel is like saying that Perfect Dark was a sequel to Goldeneye. Sure, they're similar in many, many respects. The only problem with your arguement is that YOU AREN'T EVEN IN THE SAME UNIVERSE, let alone within the same ballpark. I think we can all agree that PD is in no way Goldeneye:2, right? :P Posted by: Ray on July 16, 2003 12:58 PMThe same goes for Timesplitters 2 [if there was a Timesplitters 1 I never got around to playing it so don't bring it up]. TS2 is also very similar to PD/Goldeneye, and it's not a sequel to either of them. Companies take good ideas from within their organization and run with them. It doesn't make them have any continuity besides genre and gameplay. Sequels tend to have some element of transition between games, or at least tie up loose ends and involve each other at some level. Posted by: Ray on July 16, 2003 01:00 PMtell me who the fuck still plays on Mac anyway!? If you want games then get a real gaming platform, not a fancy text processor... Posted by: RJ on July 16, 2003 01:42 PMSomething that I don't think anyone else has pointed out, is the similarity between the Marathon logo, and the Quake logo. Perhaps some of the developers of Quake were Marathon fans. I've never played, or even heard of, Marathon, but after reading all of this I am very interested. Does anyone know where I can download a copy of this game? I wonder if it will work on Mac OSX? Posted by: SubSpecies23 on July 16, 2003 06:38 PMdoes that mean halo is like aliens 2.5 or something because they have like a sgt who was like apone from the movie and like the marines who tag along with you are like the USCM Posted by: Blehh on July 16, 2003 06:45 PM"Okay. Saying Halo is a Marathon sequel is like saying that Perfect Dark was a sequel to Goldeneye. Sure, they're similar in many, many respects. The only problem with your arguement is that YOU AREN'T EVEN IN THE SAME UNIVERSE, let alone within the same ballpark. I think we can all agree that PD is in no way Goldeneye:2, right? :P Posted by: Ray Posted by: Ray Posted by: RJ" Sorry i really need to clarify a few things, so at the risk of sounding like a smart A$$.... Ray, Perfect Dark did take place in the same universe. It was on Earth (for the most part) wasn't it. Beyond that they all (007,PD,TS1/2) play the exact same way because it's the same team that made all 4 of those games they just broke off from Rare and formed Free Radical. So i suppose they felt like evolving the FPS' gameplay throughout all 4 of those titles. RJ, there are plenty of people who still play on macs and that trend is increasing. Just so you know though, Halo PREMIERED at Macworld 99, and some of the first footage of Doom 3 was shown at Macworld 01. That and macs aren't fancy text processors, for an example of what macs are generally used for go watch any movie that has really nice cg and ask the artists what kind of computer they have. PEACE Posted by: KingTalo on July 16, 2003 07:21 PMJust a quick note that Tribes 2 had a similar multiplayer mode, where whoever held something for the longest amount of time wins. Posted by: Zyphlar on July 17, 2003 01:59 AM"I've never played, or even heard of, Marathon, but after reading all of this I am very interested. Does anyone know where I can download a copy of this game? I wonder if it will work on Mac OSX? Posted by: SubSpecies23" Well, Sub, i believe they still allow you to buy the Marathon trilogy at bungie.com (wouldn't really know since i stopped paying any attention to bungie since the M$ buyout) and if you would like to play it on OSX then goto source.bungie.org and download Marathon:Aleph One. It's got all those goodies you'd expect from an open source project; openGl, windows/linux support for Marathon1/infinity, internet play etc. VERY FUN STUFF! :) Posted by: KingTalo on July 17, 2003 06:37 AMForgive the use of a fake e-mail, but I so hate inundation with spam. Now then... As a fellow Mac Gamer (our poor beleagured platform that can handle PC titles better than PCs), I think that you might be onto something. All PC users DO is scoff at us and our games. If they hadn't SEEN you playing Escape Velocity, they wouldn't care no matter what. And I think that goes ditto for Marathon, unfortunately. It's a stigma, and the lot of you PC gaming twinks can't admit it-and that's fine. But be honest with yourselves. As I recall, Bungie WAS working on Marathon 4 and scrapped it for Halo. And you guys are right-the games are essentially identical and different at the same time. I'm not even going to get into a continuity argument here-though it would stand to reason that this is more than 20 years down the line from Marathon Infinity. And as for scrapping the Halo moniker and calling it Marathon 4, what's wrong with calling it Halo? We Mac guys need to be honest here too. We're ticked off that Microshaft bought Bungie-more than that, it's probably going to be the beginning of the end for a great game studio. The great Myth platform battle will cease to exist, and instead we'll have microsoft raking these Bungie guys against the coals to pound out successful FORMULAIC game after game. Honestly... Regardless of this whole Marathon/Halo conspiracy as you might like to think of it... We all lost on this deal. Posted by: Lazar Cotoron on July 17, 2003 06:52 PMI've never played Marathon myself, but when the first similarities came up I took an interest & looked into it. The article is great, clearly written with a great deal of enthusiasm & as one of the most die hard Halo fans out there, was very impressed with it. I was wondering if you had ever submitted this article to www.halo.bungie.org as they have a huge resource of such things & I am certain much of what you have found has not been uncovered by anyone else. Good work! Posted by: Traize on July 17, 2003 11:42 PMhey, this is the first time I've ever visited a gaming site designed for women! thats awesome! on topic now: very nice detective work on the marathon similarities. I dont necissarily agree that Halo is just a sequel to the Marathon series, but I do believe Halo was based on the concept of Marathon. Just my 2 cents worth Posted by: Deano on July 18, 2003 11:18 AMLazar; You must be mistaken; bungie specifically stated that they were going to end the series with Infinity, which is the reason they released the map/physics editors with it (and soon after, the trilogy). For anyone who's interested; after finishing Myth2:Soulblighter (an extraordinary 3d rts game that featured smooth flowing terrain) one of the devs supposedly tinkered with the engine so that he could run around on the landscape in first person. Pretty much how bungie actually started work on halo. Posted by: KingTalo on July 18, 2003 12:03 PMYes, the similarities are there as with all the bungie games. Everybody says they're everywhere. Not just the grunts and the marines, but the poachers in Myth II: Soulblighter. You can't say that a game is a prequel or sequel unless the creators of the game (bungie in this case) announce it. "There are only two infinites:human stupidity and the universe, and I'm not too sure about the universe." -Albert Einstien Posted by: XvShadow on July 19, 2003 11:27 PMI got this from an interview with the Halo Team, from XBN Issue 02. Talking about the character you play in the original Marathon and Master Chief Additionally, Seropian says that Halo (the concept/seed of, started with Marathon In the interview they also mention that Halo as a game was originally designed to be like their game Myth. This concept evolved mumerous times, to become the Halo we know today. After this concept was changes to a 3rd person action game, Marcus Lehto and his art team began work on the "Halo Universe", developing concepts for characters and vechiles. After reading this interview, as well as this post, it is my personal opinion that Marathon and it's concepts, played a huge role in the influencing and shaping of Halo. Many of the character types and comcepts carried over to Halo. It may be a spirtual sequel to Marathon, but Halo and its universe is techniquelly seperate from Marathons. Posted by: Red Iguana on July 21, 2003 12:55 PMI just spent an entire night looking at different sites and forums trying to figure out the infamous "Cortanas Letters", before I stumbled upon this site. All the information in this article is just a very small piece of the puzzle. I personally believe that Halo is actually a prequel to the Marathon, and I'll list my reasons why I believe this. Thanks for your time, Joshua W. De Vries Posted by: Arcane on July 23, 2003 05:19 AMHere's what I use as proof they are in the same universe based on the gameplay as well as reading both official books. Note: I said same universe. Halo is not Marathon 4 because of the difference in story and location. If you wore Mark IV armor in Marathon it would make it impossible for Master Chief to be the main character, which rules out the Prequel hypothesis. 1. MJOLNIR armor is actually Project MJOLNIR, the code name for the Mark V armor. If you read Fall of Reach carefully you will not only notice that it mentions this, but it also describes the Master Chief and the spartans training against people wearing old "prototype Mark I armor" for their protection. Dr. Haley: "Yes I know all about the Mark I prototypes. We had to scrap the concept and redesign battle armor from the ground up for the MJOLNIR project." 2. Quote: "The Pillar of Autumn is forty-three years old," Cortana said. "Halcyon-class ships were the smallest vessel ever to recieve the cruiser designation. It is approximately one-third the tonnage of Marathon-class cruiser currently in service." I'm sure this means something. 3. Similarities between the weapons as mentioned above, not to mention the fact that AIs are used all the time in ships in the Halo books. Also, putting the Marathon logo smack in the center of the Halo logo is too direct to be just a passing reference. Its too much to deny and say "they are just paying homage" or "Halo is teh best and you sux cause I dont pay any atention to waht anyoen said!!!" You know, I'm amazed at how many people have nothing more to say then: Halo = Marathon Spinoff Master Chief = VacBob with lots of experience (Master Chief is the highest possible Navy enlisted rank, "eagle claws and two stars over three chevrons." I have to wonder what his rate is…) UESC Marathon was Demios, the moon of Mars converted into a colony ship, not a class of vessle. Let's not forget Thoth, the S'pht AI, the incarnation of Tao- always favored the underdog and never ever helped the one with more strength. Tycho was destroyed in the original Pfhor attack, Durandal damaged and freed as a sapient being, and Leela unscathed but later killed, reverse-engineered, and mass produced for a Pfhor data network. Tycho was rebuilt by the Pfhor and turned on Durandal after gaining sentience. And never forget that "Pillar of Autumn!!" is a fantastic swearword to use during LAN play, which loosely translates into "oh, you pathetic failure! a monkey on crack could've done better!" Posted by: JJ on July 24, 2003 11:13 PMmaybe they just didn't want to call it Marathon 4, cuz marathon sounds like a running game, does it not? halo sounds much cooler Posted by: huh on July 27, 2003 10:30 AMThere are a lot of tie-ins to Marathon and it feels like there should be some kind of connection. Hopefully Halo 2 will give us some kind of insight as to whether it is a prequel to the Marathon series (some of the tech, namely AIs and starships, seems primitive compared to what was in Marathon). Posted by: rav on July 27, 2003 11:50 PMI love this kind of thing. . .and wish Halo 2 had more of it. Like El Mariachi vs Desperado. A little bit sequel, little bit. . .remake. All fun. . . Posted by: Chris on July 31, 2003 05:58 AMHI Every theory has its critics. I personally feel a great deal of investigative reporting and research has been done here, and here is significant evidence to assert that Halo is in fact a sequel to the lesser known Marathon series. Being a PC gamer primarily, I understand how a game like Marathon could slip under the radar, but a great friend of mine pointed it out to me when Marathon 2: Durandal was released. So I did fortunately get a chance to take a look at it, I went back and played the first, then eagerly awaited the third. While I did form my own theory with my friends that Halo was Marathon 4, they brought up similar arguments that similarities do not necessarily define a sequel, merely homage. Is Bungie paying homage to a game long in their past? Perhaps, but I think they want to continue Marathon and bring it all to the public eye. Posted by: Pernese on August 12, 2003 12:38 AMMy personal take is that Halo isn't a sequel to marathon as such - but it does take place in the universe ... I guess a similar kind of situation would be something like Star Trek or something ... where each of the stories take place in different places at different times, with different characters and stories, but there are marked similarities between them. Just a thought. Posted by: ChrisM on August 18, 2003 07:05 AMAnyone who thinks that Bungie would simply "homage" does not know Bungie. All references to the event several million years ago, for instance, refer to the Bungie game "Pathways Into Darkness". Who would keep this ancient game's timeline going through three concecutive games and believe the obious Marathoneque references are just "thrown in"? Did I say "months"? I meant "hours". Posted by: Thenomain on August 18, 2003 09:42 PMhalo is a wicked ame I don't know why you guys are dumping on it so much just stfu and play the damn game !! Posted by: edfiki on August 26, 2003 03:26 AMhalo is a wicked ame I don't know why you guys are dumping on it so much just stfu and play the damn game !! Posted by: edfiki on August 26, 2003 03:26 AMhalo is a wicked ame I don't know why you guys are dumping on it so much just stfu and play the damn game !! Posted by: edfiki on August 26, 2003 03:26 AMLiked Halo. Never played Marathon, but after reading the article and all the responses I believe that Halo is not really a sequel or prequel, but a seperate side story that takes place in the same universe. I believe that the events in each game relate to each other and that they'll probably be tied together somewhere down the line. Now I don't understand all this insecurity about Halo though. No one said that it wasn't a good game, people are just pointing out that it may be part of a greater storyline... and what's wrong with that? Posted by: apathetic mocha on August 27, 2003 10:27 AMwell I'm a big halo fan. well I'm a big halo fan. Your point is clear but Perfect Dark also had King of the Hill I hope all you people still realise that Halo, was originally supposed to be out on PC instead of XBOX Posted by: lol on November 22, 2003 11:39 PMI hope all you people still realise that Halo, was originally supposed to be out on PC instead of XBOX. Watch some of the originall PC trailers, and you will see how much it was changed for the XBOX. Posted by: lol on November 22, 2003 11:41 PMto "lol" you are a dumbass if you think that to be true, Halo was developed as a FPS game for XBOX by Bungie, a sub-let corporation of XBOX, yes yes, xbox is a microsoft product with mainly computer-type engines but still, if it was designed for PC then it would have been on PC first, and the PC game sucks comparitively. Also all of you who think Halo is really a sequel to marathon need to pull your heads out of your ass and wake the hell up. numeber one read the book Halo: The Fall of reach and you will see that JOHN, NOT BOB is the master cheif and NON CYBORG HUMAN who has been genetically altered at a previous dad, cryogenically frozen to be used for alter cambative experiences and not armed with class IV armor or class V armor but he is clad in armor known as MJOLNIR. Also the Covenant is no new threat to the UNSC forces as the battle has raged for years, the name slips my mind but that is not the same as the Marathon name, so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4. Its not a sequal in some respect, the designers of Halo were probably just influenced from Marathon back in their youth. I'm sure Marathon has influences from other earlier games/films/comics too. Posted by: Flava on December 12, 2003 06:14 AMIts not a sequal in some respect, the designers of Halo were probably just influenced from Marathon back in their youth. I'm sure Marathon has influences from other earlier games/films/comics too. Posted by: Flava on December 12, 2003 06:15 AMI have a new idia, what to meik new game called star ship troopers it is a vidio byt it would make a great game in the right hands and if you do plees send me a copy of it and halo 2 I allredy have halo 1 and, congradulations wickid, and well done. Posted by: Dewi on December 15, 2003 11:31 AMPeople are extremely aggressive about these sort of comments, aren't they? I haven't played any of the Marathon games, but I do find Halo fun. I'll have to look for the Marathon logo in the game! Thanks for writing a great article. Posted by: dr4gonm4n on January 5, 2004 07:33 PMHas anyone seen the similarities between the Fusion Pistol in Marathon and the Plasma Pistol in Halo?
Does anyone other than me see the striking similarity between Durandal and 343 Guilty Spark? Cortana will likely go rampant in Halo 2 or perhaps Halo 3. Posted by: Durandal Is GOD on January 28, 2004 05:10 PMHas anyone seen the similarities between the Fusion Pistol in Marathon and the Plasma Pistol in Halo?
Does anyone other than me see the striking similarity between Durandal and 343 Guilty Spark? Cortana will likely go rampant in Halo 2 or perhaps Halo 3. Posted by: Durandal Is GOD on January 28, 2004 05:11 PMHas anyone seen the similarities between the Fusion Pistol in Marathon and the Plasma Pistol in Halo?
Does anyone other than me see the striking similarity between Durandal and 343 Guilty Spark? Cortana will likely go rampant in Halo 2 or perhaps Halo 3. Posted by: Durandal Is GOD on January 28, 2004 05:11 PMI have played both halo and marathon and loved them both. Not sure if any of this has be menchond (to much here to read in one sitting)but first marathon had a flame thrower and halo was suppose to and second if you have played halo you know the MC is not an andriod or like because he takes his helmet off! Posted by: Roger on January 31, 2004 06:01 PMgames rule Posted by: Thomas on February 4, 2004 12:30 PMgames rule Posted by: Thomas on February 4, 2004 12:30 PMId also like to point out the marathon logo is on the tip of the pipe captain keyes is holding. Posted by: Keezz on March 2, 2004 10:31 PMthats totally ridiculous. plenty of games from the same companies have easter eggs from previous games.the only people who would call halo marathon 4 would be marathon fanatics who cant seem to handle the fact that the marathon series is dead, as in not being continued. besides the armor is not mark v armor. Thats the prequisisit to the mjolnir armor that mc and the spartans use in halo.and the rocket launcher, that just says that bungi liked what they did and wanted to keep things similar. besides diddnt they just finish 3 marathons. i mean, thats a lot of time in wich they were using the same development methods on the same platforms using the same ideas. its not hard to belive any of this but is no way is HALO a marathon. if really want to know read the first two halo books their both approved by bungi. Posted by: uway44 on March 15, 2004 03:59 PMthats totally ridiculous. plenty of games from the same companies have easter eggs from previous games.the only people who would call halo marathon 4 would be marathon fanatics who cant seem to handle the fact that the marathon series is dead, as in not being continued. besides the armor is not mark v armor. Thats the prequisisit to the mjolnir armor that mc and the spartans use in halo.and the rocket launcher, that just says that bungi liked what they did and wanted to keep things similar. besides diddnt they just finish 3 marathons. i mean, thats a lot of time in wich they were using the same development methods on the same platforms using the same ideas. its not hard to belive any of this but is no way is HALO a marathon. if really want to know read the first two halo books their both approved by bungi. Posted by: uway44 on March 15, 2004 04:01 PMYou know, I think several people here have made very credible points. I have played both games, surprising for a dedicated PC user, and they bear quite a remarkable similarity. (I STILL hate those idiotic one-button mice) In any case, both games are landmark software, and should be treated as such. Wether or not one is the other is rather irrelivant, I think. Perhaps it is a batter idea to spend the time playing the games, rather than debating their lineage. Posted by: Kahless on March 19, 2004 11:22 PMHi, i'm not trying to be mean or rude or anything but i came across this website and it really got to me. i'm a really big fan of Halo. i don't know what "Marathon" is but by the pics i see, it seems like Halo and Marathon do have some similarities but Halo has much better graphics then Marathon and why would u want to call a war-killing-alien game "Marathon"? if i just heard that name and not seen the game, i would thought it's about marathons and stuff. no, Halo is a better name and it sounds more interesting. wut really got me going was when i saw pics from the game and where you guys found stuff belonging to the Marathong game. so what? maybe Bungie just wanted to put some memories of that game on Halo for Marathon-lovers. jeez, it's nothing devastating, no offence. i love playing Halo but this just really got me mad. it's like as if wut Bungie did was a crime, but really, no. and i'd like to say that Kahless is right, why the hell care if they have similarities? they still have differences here people. oh, and uway 44 is totally right. frig, if u people could see these things, u guys are paranoid, no offence. Roger also has a point there about the Master Chief. even though i don't know these people, i agree with them cuz they have they same point of view as i do. everything Widow Maker said is true. Ed also is right and speaks the god damn truth, unfortunatly for u guys. whatever u guys find wrong with Halo, i just have one thing to say bout that: get a life! play the game, have fun, and forget about Marathon. it was played in the 90's and i'm pretty sure there's a lot more people that have the same opinion that i do. to me, just because they seem to be wars going on in the same universe is no biggy. i don't care, at least they happen at different times. also, i haven't played or read or even have a game with a great storyline, characters and more like Halo. i think Bungie is very creative and yes, probably did use somethings from Marathon to pay homage. why? probably because Marathon was becoming less popular and probably people wanted something better! and what they got was fabulous Halo!!!!!!! i can't wait for Halo 2, and i'm positive that the Halo series will so be so much funner and better than Marathon!!! no offence but it's my opinion. i don't want to get anyone pissed off or anything but u can't get mad for what i said. sry if i said something that made u guys angry. halo empress Posted by: halo empress on March 25, 2004 02:21 PMHi, i'm not trying to be mean or rude or anything but i came across this website and it really got to me. i'm a really big fan of Halo. i don't know what "Marathon" is but by the pics i see, it seems like Halo and Marathon do have some similarities but Halo has much better graphics then Marathon and why would u want to call a war-killing-alien game "Marathon"? if i just heard that name and not seen the game, i would thought it's about marathons and stuff. no, Halo is a better name and it sounds more interesting. wut really got me going was when i saw pics from the game and where you guys found stuff belonging to the Marathong game. so what? maybe Bungie just wanted to put some memories of that game on Halo for Marathon-lovers. jeez, it's nothing devastating, no offence. i love playing Halo but this just really got me mad. it's like as if wut Bungie did was a crime, but really, no. and i'd like to say that Kahless is right, why the hell care if they have similarities? they still have differences here people. oh, and uway 44 is totally right. frig, if u people could see these things, u guys are paranoid, no offence. Roger also has a point there about the Master Chief. even though i don't know these people, i agree with them cuz they have they same point of view as i do. everything Widow Maker said is true. Ed also is right and speaks the god damn truth, unfortunatly for u guys. whatever u guys find wrong with Halo, i just have one thing to say bout that: get a life! play the game, have fun, and forget about Marathon. it was played in the 90's and i'm pretty sure there's a lot more people that have the same opinion that i do. to me, just because they seem to be wars going on in the same universe is no biggy. i don't care, at least they happen at different times. also, i haven't played or read or even have a game with a great storyline, characters and more like Halo. i think Bungie is very creative and yes, probably did use somethings from Marathon to pay homage. why? probably because Marathon was becoming less popular and probably people wanted something better! and what they got was fabulous Halo!!!!!!! i can't wait for Halo 2, and i'm positive that the Halo series will so be so much funner and better than Marathon!!! no offence but it's my opinion. i don't want to get anyone pissed off or anything but u can't get mad for what i said. sry if i said something that made u guys angry. halo empress Posted by: halo empress on March 25, 2004 02:21 PMHi, i'm not trying to be mean or rude or anything but i came across this website and it really got to me. i'm a really big fan of Halo. i don't know what "Marathon" is but by the pics i see, it seems like Halo and Marathon do have some similarities but Halo has much better graphics then Marathon and why would u want to call a war-killing-alien game "Marathon"? if i just heard that name and not seen the game, i would thought it's about marathons and stuff. no, Halo is a better name and it sounds more interesting. wut really got me going was when i saw pics from the game and where you guys found stuff belonging to the Marathong game. so what? maybe Bungie just wanted to put some memories of that game on Halo for Marathon-lovers. jeez, it's nothing devastating, no offence. i love playing Halo but this just really got me mad. it's like as if wut Bungie did was a crime, but really, no. and i'd like to say that Kahless is right, why the hell care if they have similarities? they still have differences here people. oh, and uway 44 is totally right. frig, if u people could see these things, u guys are paranoid, no offence. Roger also has a point there about the Master Chief. even though i don't know these people, i agree with them cuz they have they same point of view as i do. everything Widow Maker said is true. Ed also is right and speaks the god damn truth, unfortunatly for u guys. whatever u guys find wrong with Halo, i just have one thing to say bout that: get a life! play the game, have fun, and forget about Marathon. it was played in the 90's and i'm pretty sure there's a lot more people that have the same opinion that i do. to me, just because they seem to be wars going on in the same universe is no biggy. i don't care, at least they happen at different times. also, i haven't played or read or even have a game with a great storyline, characters and more like Halo. i think Bungie is very creative and yes, probably did use somethings from Marathon to pay homage. why? probably because Marathon was becoming less popular and probably people wanted something better! and what they got was fabulous Halo!!!!!!! i can't wait for Halo 2, and i'm positive that the Halo series will so be so much funner and better than Marathon!!! no offence but it's my opinion. i don't want to get anyone pissed off or anything but u can't get mad for what i said. sry if i said something that made u guys angry. halo empress Posted by: halo empress on March 25, 2004 02:22 PMHalo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, Halo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, Halo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, Halo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, Halo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, Halo is Halo. Iv'e never heard of marothon before, but from the pics at the top of the page it looks like the graphics realy, realy, realy suck. my opinion is this, the same as widow maker's "so what if there are "easter eggs" until i see that damn easter bunny i'm going to call Halo by it's name and not Marothon 4." i believe those little eastereggs you all call were put in there because Halo's creaters (bungie) used up all there ideas and so they 'borrowed' some stuff from other games so that they could spark there inmagination again. shot in the head with a S2AM sniper round by, there not called bobs u fucking idiot...the master cheifs code number is 117 and his real nme is john...he started to get trained when he was 6 and became the squad leader of the other spartans...he had a team with uniforms that looked exactly like his and he had 2 friends...Sam And....well i forget the girls name but they both died in a war but not with the covenent...then the pillar of autumn got attacked and well u no if u played the game..........any way hope u gathered information by this and see u around...Master Chief 360 Posted by: Master Cheif 360 on May 1, 2004 06:00 AMthere not called bobs u fucking idiot...the master cheifs code number is 117 and his real nme is john...he started to get trained when he was 6 and became the squad leader of the other spartans...he had a team with uniforms that looked exactly like his and he had 2 friends...Sam And....well i forget the girls name but they both died in a war but not with the covenent...then the pillar of autumn got attacked and well u no if u played the game..........any way hope u gathered information by this and see u around...Master Chief 360 Posted by: Master Cheif 360 on May 1, 2004 06:00 AMthere not called bobs u fucking idiot...the master cheifs code number is 117 and his real nme is john...he started to get trained when he was 6 and became the squad leader of the other spartans...he had a team with uniforms that looked exactly like his and he had 2 friends...Sam And....well i forget the girls name but they both died in a war but not with the covenent...then the pillar of autumn got attacked and well u no if u played the game..........any way hope u gathered information by this and see u around...Master Chief 360 Posted by: Master Cheif 360 on May 1, 2004 06:00 AMTHE GRAPHICS SUCK BECAUSE IT WAS MADE YEARS AGO ON A MAC, WHEN THAT WAS THE BEST LOOKING GAME THERE WAS! Posted by: bob on May 13, 2004 02:08 PMOkay, I think this is pretty convincing...but Im still staying with the fact that Halo is Halo. Hell, if you look at the Scorpion (tank) on the back theres a special little Easter Egg....the GameCube logo. You may need to use a pistol or Sniper Rifle, but its there. This doesnt mean that Halo has any future on the gamcube or anything, its just an easter egg. I think they put all of the Marathon things in there for all of the fans of Marathon to find them, and some memories as well.... The Bobs in Marathon -do- look a lot like Spartans in MJOLNIR armor, but Master Chief's name is John... Posted by: Kotaru on June 9, 2004 03:46 PMOkay, I think this is pretty convincing...but Im still staying with the fact that Halo is Halo. Hell, if you look at the Scorpion (tank) on the back theres a special little Easter Egg....the GameCube logo. You may need to use a pistol or Sniper Rifle, but its there. This doesnt mean that Halo has any future on the gamcube or anything, its just an easter egg. I think they put all of the Marathon things in there for all of the fans of Marathon to find them, and some memories as well.... The Bobs in Marathon -do- look a lot like Spartans in MJOLNIR armor, but Master Chief's name is John... Posted by: Kotaru on June 9, 2004 03:47 PMSomewhere in an Halo level, you can hear a Myth Music... Posted by: Ecco on June 18, 2004 02:49 PMSomewhere in an Halo level, you can hear a Myth Music... Posted by: Ecco on June 18, 2004 02:49 PMWHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK?!? THE PEOPLE AT BUNGIE WOULD LAUGH THEIR ASSES OFF IF THEY SAW THIS POINTLESS SHIT!! WHO FUCKING CARES IF HALO IS A SEQUEL?! IT STILL EXISTS EITHER WAY, SO WHO GIVES A FUCK?!? Posted by: FreekShow on June 27, 2004 03:06 AMWHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK?!? THE PEOPLE AT BUNGIE WOULD LAUGH THEIR ASSES OFF IF THEY SAW THIS POINTLESS SHIT!! WHO FUCKING CARES IF HALO IS A SEQUEL?! IT STILL EXISTS EITHER WAY, SO WHO GIVES A FUCK?!? Posted by: FreekShow on June 27, 2004 03:07 AMWHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK?!? THE PEOPLE AT BUNGIE WOULD LAUGH THEIR ASSES OFF IF THEY SAW THIS POINTLESS SHIT!! WHO FUCKING CARES IF HALO IS A SEQUEL?! IT STILL EXISTS EITHER WAY, SO WHO GIVES A FUCK?!? Posted by: FreekShow on June 27, 2004 03:07 AMok... FreekShow... +5 Troll... If I had a rocket launcher.... To the few of us that actually played thru the Marathon series, Halo is an extension. To the PC folk who mock Marathon simply because it was on the Mac, you don't know what you missed. Doom sucked. Even Doom 3 sucks compared to Halo. I wouldn't classify Halo as a Marathon sequel, but it's the same universe with the same toys. Think Star Trek TNG and Voyager and DS9. Different cast, different parts of the same universe, but a unified, coherent, similar feel. To the guy who asked about Halo's vehicles... ok so the added new features. Good for Bungie. Thats not enough of a difference to nullify the similarities. Halo 2 now includes support for dual-weapons. Halo-only players are like "wow thats way cool yo", Marathon players are like "been there done that". Marathon's graphics look crappy by todays (read, Halo's) standards, but break out your copy of Doom from 1994 and compare. You'll see a world of difference. Marathon introduced looking up and down, dynamic lighting, sound, and physics, intelligent enemies, and a wicked story. Doom = see demon, shoot demon. Perhaps amusing to the kids, but by no means captivating. There's a reason Marathon is as talked about as it is. It was ahead of it's time and defined what a good FPS was all about, up to Rainbow 6, then Halo. TOZT with your SPNKr anyone? Posted by: Eric on October 15, 2004 11:32 AMStay off u pc losers.. stfu.. u aint noe shyt.. though my 66mhz mac is stored away in the basement for years. i now use a penitum 4.. but marathon is tite as fuk... marathon 4ever!!.. marathon used the dual weapons and it was awesome.. Eric..u have good point :) .. MARATHON RULES! MAC RULES!.. why yal jus hatin Macs cuz everybody says it.. its so stupid Posted by: Marathon2 on October 28, 2004 09:00 PMI don't know if anyone else noticed this because I didn't read all of the comments, but in the book "Fall of Reach" there is a class of ship called Marathon. Posted by: vyroglyph on November 2, 2004 03:47 PMalso, in marathon there is a level called "I wish i had a rocket launcher" and in halo there is one called "I wish I had a super weapon" Posted by: vyroglyph on November 2, 2004 03:51 PMactually, halo is like a souped-up marathon with different names for all the characters. I use a pc but I still like to play marathon on my mac. Why don't you people who say marathon sucks get a clue. You have no idea what brilliant ideas bungie came up with before halo. I bet you never even heard of Rock'n'Roll Racing. Posted by: tbg on November 4, 2004 10:33 PMdid anyone think that maybe, forerunner is what the humans/covenant called the ancient race and "jarro" is what they called themselves? Posted by: jarro on November 5, 2004 08:59 AMJust got Halo 2, and hadn't played Halo 1, but I played all of the Marathons (Marathon 2 is on PC AND Mac, BTW)... First things I noticed were the logo, the spnkr, and (was this in Halo 1)? The HUNTER creature, which is lifted DIRECTLY from Marathon. Looks like and acts like the Marathon hunter. So if they are in different universes, this creature knows how to travel between them ; ) I can't see why people would be so resistant to the connections... they are both excellent, story-driven action games with a lot of similarities... Marathon players know, this is the same universe... Posted by: Tim on November 10, 2004 08:28 AMFirst of all, the reason Bungie added things from Marthon into Halo, is too attract people who had been Marathon gamers!
Something that i was thinking about playing halo 2, is that the covenant is attacking earth and possibly aiming to destroy it, which would definately warrent the colony ships that were in the marathon series to start being produced and sent out to attempt to keep the human race alive. Posted by: Zachary Mohney on November 11, 2004 10:24 PMwhy are you so angry that someone thinks halo is a sequel? i dont get it. and stop posting the same thing so much its annoying. Posted by: jjaro on February 9, 2005 03:20 PMMany of the employees at Bungie now were not at Bungie at the time of Marathon, so your argument that similarities between the two games are due to them having "the same creators" is invalid. Any resemblance between the two is certainly NOT coincidental. Posted by: vyroglyph on June 13, 2005 04:02 PMMany of the employees at Bungie now were not at Bungie at the time of Marathon, so your argument that similarities between the two games are due to them having "the same creators" is invalid. Any resemblance between the two is certainly NOT coincidental. Posted by: vyroglyph on June 13, 2005 04:02 PMThe so-called Marathon symbol is also the shape of the control room(s). Download Aleph One (part of Microsoft's Open-Source Initiative). It plays on Windows and OS X (a Linux version is reportedly in the works). For me, it's like Halo with a better frame rate. Posted by: merv on December 31, 2005 10:35 PMOkay, kinda late, but I just gotta say somthing. no one really thinks halo is a sequel, she just wants to see all you dumb ass noobs get bent about mac's (because they kick more ass 'n stuff). as I type this on my my iBook, I have all three Marathon games on my hard drive, and the first halo. Marathon was an awsome game back in the day, and anyone who disses it should be kneecaped. in '95 i was 9 years old and back then it was THE SHIT, so stuff you ass with a cork M$ whores cuz your talking out of it. everyone looks back on something I their childhood fondly, and for me one thing is marathon. (sad? mabey, but now my imagination soars.) it had somewhat less action, but what halo has in action, marathon had in story. as for the similarities, the reasons are obvious: marathon was GOOD. the symbol. just look at it. come on... its cool, huh? and spnkr? thats l33t speek before l33t. and, oh yeah, when you get hit with it, you...get...spanked. in reality halo is a collection of things origionally made for marathon, but up-graded (excepting the plot, but then again, I'm partial to marathon) hey... why not reuse genius? P.S. M$ stole bunjie from the free world because they needed a kick ass game, and after reveiwing their past record, they knew halo would be good. Posted by: Rygo on April 22, 2006 01:52 AMAnyone else notice that on the mission were your on the halo for the first time on halo 2 that the other spartans look exactly like the 'bobs' from merathon? Posted by: I made this for one post on June 3, 2006 08:00 PM
|