Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
February 16, 2003
please explain this to me - GBA GTA3?
Seen on GameStop today - Grand Theft Auto 3 for the Game Boy Advance. How would that work? (I guess maybe it's been cancelled - maybe - I still want to know how someone planned to translate the expansive world of GTA3 to a pinched, dark GBA screen. I guess there would probably be less risk of confusing GBA GTA3 with reality! Posted by justin at February 16, 2003 04:15 PM | TrackBackComments
Psst... Have a peek at the ETA. :-) Posted by: Brian McGroarty on February 16, 2003 06:04 PMsounds...interesting. maybe it's going to be a bastardized GTA, top-down view and all. i definitely think this game is geared towards the new line of GBA's coming out around the same time. the GBA Special Edition looks freakin' awesome. oh yeah. Posted by: jon on February 17, 2003 11:37 AMI think you're just trolling here, because you certainly know the answer. Publishers distribute handheld versions of most top titles, and it's not really a matter of concern that handheld devices aren't able to reproduce the experience. Game publishing is a difficult business in which to make a buck, and extension of the franchise to the handheld is inexpensive and moderately profitable. Some developers, like Vicarious Visions, do a great job of extending the creative potential of GBA, but it's still a cruddy little device. Posted by: Nathan Solomon on February 18, 2003 07:11 AM"Game publishing is a difficult business in which to make a buck ..." Cf., the last EA press release(http://info.ea.com/pr/pr286.pdf): "today announced record financial results for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2002. Consolidated net revenues for the quarter were $1.23 billion, up 48 percent compared with $833 million for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2001 ... Consolidated net income for the quarter was $250 million, an 89 percent increase over the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter was $1.69, up 84 percent, or $0.77, year over year." (Also, 2002 U.S. games software sales were up 21% over the already record 2001. Can't be *that* hard.) Posted by: Stewart on February 19, 2003 07:34 PMUsing EA as an example of the state of the industry is like using Microsoft's track record to try and prove that a start-up PC software company has the potential to make it rich. Take a look at the number 2, 3, and 4th place 3rd party publisher's stocks: THQ, Midway, Acclaim. They're not even half as good as EA's revenue. In fact, most of them are in the crapper and trying to figure out how to stay afloat. It's not that easy to make money in videogames anymore. The cost of making games is rising dramatically, and the bottom line is staying the same. Profits have to be made somehow, ergo the cheap and easy buck on the handheld. But I still think GTA3 is a bad idea. I'd wager it's going to look a lot like the previous GTA incarnations: top down and not a lot of get-out-of-your-car interaction. Posted by: Bowler on February 19, 2003 08:24 PMGood points Bowler - I concede. (Tho' I maintain that there is plenty to be made in the business for people doing the right stuff --- look at NCSoft's latest earnings, or think of cheap-as-hell games like Roller Coaster Tycoon making it big. Putting out a mediocre product that is hard to distinguish from all the other mediocre products doesn't work in any industry, so I don't think the problem is particular to the games business.) Posted by: Stewart on February 21, 2003 04:49 AMgta3 was designed for the gba sp not the old one i think it will be a all right game, but it wont be as good on the ps2 obviously Posted by: spencer on April 7, 2003 09:24 AMGTA3 on GBA could have been something, considering Links- Crazy Taxi GBA- http://www.gamespot.com/gba/driving/crazytaxicatcharide/screenindex.html Driver 2 GBA-http://www.gamespot.com/gba/driving/driver2advance/index.html Quake and Quake 2 GBA - http://www.bobbeetec.com/drg.htm GTA3 could have been given a good run on the GBA. Posted by: Daniel Tarr on April 10, 2003 04:44 PMI think the New GTA 3 will be Full 3D allthough obviously less detail than the PS2/PC versions. You can buy blank cratreges (for roms) for GBA's on the net that store over a Gigabyte of info and have any of you seen driver 2 for GBA? 4 full cities, full 3D and you can get out of the car and into any others in the City. i know this for a fact because i own a copy of it for my GBA. i cant wait for GBA GTA3 i think its gonna b awsome. and BTW the GBA SP is only a little faster, not alot in it! (my m8 has one) Posted by: Nark on July 20, 2003 08:08 AMGTA3 could very well be done on the GBA in 3D fashion. Check out Payback.A GTA clone in development for the GBA and looking mighty fun. Posted by: Mechanical6 on July 20, 2003 05:54 PMI believe that there was a 3rd party dev company involved in building a new engine specifically for GTA3 on the GBA. It looked pretty impressive from screen shots as well - obviously not as good as the PS2 or PC and certainly not taking the series any place the others haven't already been except into the portable arena. Last I heard it had all fallen through and Rockstar pulled out resulting in the developers losing the licence but they stated that they would go ahead and develop the engine and make a game similar to GTA3 out of it anyway. That was a few months back now, if I find any links to them I'll sling 'em up. Oh, and their ain't no way the cover art on that gamestop link is Rockstar authorised. Posted by: millionandone on August 27, 2003 07:40 AMTo view some screenshots of GTA 3 for GBA, Click here! (0_o)
To view some screenshots of GTA 3 for GBA, Click here! (0_o)
To view some screenshots of GTA 3 for GBA, Click here! (0_o)
Surely GTA III GBA is just the original GTA with less features (eg no motorbikes) Posted by: CdrJameson on September 1, 2003 07:08 AM i'll buy it.. fluck you guys. Posted by: dopey on December 11, 2003 11:13 AMi'll buy it.. fluck you guys. Posted by: dopey on December 11, 2003 11:15 AMi'll buy it.. fluck you guys. Posted by: dopey on December 11, 2003 11:20 AMI thihk so,too Posted by: julia on December 25, 2003 02:20 AMfrom the look of the above screenshots it looks like it is going to be a birdseye view (drat) i was hopeing for 3d it looks just the same as gta2 for gb colour (you can order this off rockstar)! from the look of the above screenshots it looks like it is going to be a birdseye view (drat) i was hopeing for 3d it looks just the same as gta2 for gb colour (you can order this off rockstar)! from the look of the above screenshots it looks like it is going to be a birdseye view (drat) i was hopeing for 3d it looks just the same as gta2 for gb colour (you can order this off rockstar)! A hem, all you girl know knothing of what your're talking about, GTA3 on game boy would rule, new or old, ever heard of worm lights, there is your god damned light for the old gameboy. The power of the gameboy is quite addiquate for any game. dude know what sucks is that gta3 for gba was cancled a long ass time ago... hahahaha Posted by: phuker on February 18, 2004 08:13 AMWRTYERYQERY Posted by: REYERY on March 16, 2004 07:41 PMWRTYERYQERY Posted by: REYERY on March 16, 2004 07:42 PMwhere can I get the gta3-gba rom for a gba emulator? where can I get the gta3-gba rom for a gba emulator? where can I get the gta3-gba rom for a gba emulator?. . where can I get the gta3-gba rom for a gba emulator?. . Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (24) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (18) Design (6) Economics (5) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (15) Music (17) News (15) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (13) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (45) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |