Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
April 20, 2003
Christian Game Critique
We've talked about Under Ash, a game used for political ends by Palestinian sympathizers. This fascinates me, the use of games as a means to communicate a deliberate message (other than the passive messages of most fantasy/scifi mythology in electronic entertainment). Today I stumbled across Christian Console Game Reviews, a partner site of Christian Computer Game Reviews. They host fairly typical reviews, with the addition of a "appropriatness" metric for most games - how these games suit the Christian philosophy and approach to life. The James Bond/Nightfire review belies the lure of gaming and mass media: From a Christian perspective, this game has its downfalls. The sheer fact that it is a shooter, for instance, or that it has sexual innuendo, which is, really, a part of the James Bond genre. There is one saving point, though. You are trying to save the world from another evil madman. And that makes it worth all the trouble…all the trouble…More trouble is found in the Super Smash Brothers Melee review, where the writer points out that the game has some Pokemon characters, reminiscent of How Pokemon and Magic Cards Affect the Minds and Values of Children (from May 1999). There's constant talk of how games might change us, obviously Christian writers and parents have already been giving this some thought. These writers are trying to balance the seduction of occasionally sin-laden electronic entertainment with fears they might be savaging the spirit of their faith. Gamers lacking a strong Christian persuasion have only their eternal souls to worry about. Posted by justin at April 20, 2003 06:23 PM | TrackBackComments
Ok, I look at this and see that, yes, they went overboard. The Christian reviews of different things from music to games, help parents filter out some of the bad stuff (Like GTA: Vice City). However, sometimes the reviewers go overboard and read way too far into things (Like a review of Linkin Park that pissed me off). All in all, if you really want to use them, just ignore the obvious stretches (like the pokemon thing), and focus on the real meat of the review. Posted by: SephDragoon on April 20, 2003 09:25 PMHurray for free speech! If anyone wants to review games within a political or religious context, more power to them. I forget which comedian it was, but the message always stuck with me: "It's all BS, but eventually you find some you like, and it becomes, like, your personal BS." Reviews are like that. If certain reviewers trash a movie, I'm fairly certain I'll like it. There are other reviewers, who I tend to agree with. I'm glad to have that choice. Posted by: Chris on April 21, 2003 09:10 AMi think christians should take a chill pill. video games are fun, and they shouldn't be analyzing these games and assume that it's evil. i don't think the original creators of pokemon or d&d intended to convert kids into devil warshipers..it's just good clean fun. Posted by: secretninja on April 21, 2003 05:41 PMonce more religious folks show how truly ignorant they are... but i dont think a game review taught me that lesson..none the less..yeah pretty ammusing that people would actually think such contrived things but whatever religion controls people and im all for controlling people because people are idiots Posted by: -=ExeterBlue=- on April 21, 2003 09:21 PMI resent the fact that most peple think that all christians are like the ones who blame pokemon for school shootings and the guy who stands on the street corner next to the freeway exit yelling "Jesus loves you!" through a megaphone. Just because a bunch of them are twits dosn't mean we all are. I pride myself on being able to represent gamers and the religious, and neither of them are ignorant by nature. And an electric rat is as much witchcraft as an electric eel .....so there. Posted by: Dave on April 22, 2003 01:34 AMAnother website dedicated to "inspecting" games from a Christian viewpoint is Al Menconi Ministries. The site also hands out its review scores based on "Biblical standards" rather than spending much time analyzing the game from a more traditional standpoint. Each game is introduced by examining its storyline, followed by a run-down on each of the following categories: violence, illegal/harmful material, language, nudity/sexual content, and occult/supernatural material. My parents thought most games were evil. Dave, if you're going to title yourself with something (christian, gamer, artist, male, whatever) you have to be able to stomach both the people who criticize that title and the fools who claim themselves under the same title. There are many things that I am that I would never say simply because people ruined the word and the point of categorizing is for clarity not confusion. To me calling yourself a christian, though, is like a guitarist saying he plays rock music. Any more vague and I might start bleeding from the ears. So, please, just don't say anything at all. Posted by: Draigon on April 25, 2003 08:24 AMI actually mailed Al Meconi a while back, asking him what his deal was. I was responded to very rudely , by Al himself , believe it or not. The mail said, and I quote, 'Our problem ? What's your problem ? You obviously don't like our reviews, so why don't you stop reading them?' Here's the kicker. 'And you call yourself a christian.' Yes, yes I do. AHA! Funny ? Yes. These dudes need to freakin' calm down. Seriously. Posted by: Joe on July 16, 2003 11:07 AMMight I add, they have the worst sense of humor I have ever heard, for example: "Medal of Honor is about a man who has to go behind enemy lines (no pun intended)" What the hell? There is only 1 word to describe this, idiocy. Posted by: Darklink570 on July 17, 2003 04:54 AMSome people just should review games. If they're gonna be offended by something, they shouldn't play it. So what if Quake 3 has pentagrams? Its just a symbol, and if you get offended by that, it shows how weak-minded you are. The same goes for so called "offensive" language. Their review of quake 3 brough up the fact that there is no pentagrams/ "satanic" imagery in quake 2. If they were smart, they would realise that its a whole 'nother game setting. Quake 3 used *cough* "demonic" imagery to create a dark atmosphere and suceeded, for the better. These guys don't seem like christians, more like fanatics. Eager for control over our minds. Well, if that's all you're open to, then sure. The thing is that reviewers never try to control a persons' mind; they try to tell another person their opinion, thus, possibly, influencing their opinion to make a wise purchase. It really is no different than a movie review, except done from a believer's perspective. I would know. I write reviews for the site. One of the above reviews posted is one of mine, and, yes, I take just a bit of offense at the fact that you say I have no sense of humor. But that's okay. I won't hold it against you. Still...saying that anyone is idiotic, even if it is me, is just not cool. I mean, c'mon, the sheer fact that you are talking about CCGR and its sister site (now the same site)means that it makes you think about the games you play. Maybe Diablo is making you just a bit uncomfortable now. Or maybe its Quake, dare I say it, with its maps in the shapes of pentagrams and upside-down crosses. The fact that that is acceptable to you, sheer blasphemy, is proving that you, my friends, don't have your priorities straight. The end fact is that, while some of the reviews may be amateurish and sometimes poorly written, they provide an alternative to the secular magazines that are so popular. True, I do read some of those, but I just want the info. If anyone does want the alternative, they should know it is there, and they should also know that they are free to diss it as they see fit. It doesn't bug me. I just felt like I needed to tell you what I thought. Later. Scott Posted by: Scott on October 1, 2003 01:25 PMIt's plain and simple to those who understand. How can we expect others to truly understand...it is foolishness in the eyes of those who can't understand. It used to be idiotic to me too, but once you really "see" you understand. At least we have names to ask that the blinders be removed. Posted by: sherri on October 26, 2003 07:22 PMYou're absolutely right. People need to see the truth that are in these reviews. Don't just take them at face value, but rather at what the intentions are. That means that you need to actually look at the review and read the ratings, rather than just assume that the reviewers are trying to make this world into a Big Brother society, in something like 1984 or Brave New World. Rather, we try to provide an alternative voice to the mainstream that controls the gaming industry. The fact that we are trying to report and review the things that are always kept to the big guns is a good approach to what you call brain washing and mind control. Likewise, those that use the reviews for what they truly are, a way for the Christian population to get wholesome advice, will find that, more often than not, we do have valid and good opinions that should be listened to. However, the goal is not mind control, brain washing, or assimilation, but the good use of advice and creativity that our writing produces. Ours is not merely suggestions, but rather a sort of guidance for those who would like to see what games are good and not good from a Christian perspective. This is not something to read too much into. It is merely a useful tool that you, quite obviously, have no need for. In the end, however, it is the consumer who decides what they want to see, and, currently, we are recording over 100,000 hits last year, and quickly are expanding past that point, thus the reason for our site to evolve more into something far bigger. The customization of the site also adds to the user-friendly attitude. Check it out. And you might even sign up for our newsletter. Posted by: Scott on November 10, 2003 01:36 PMI really think sites and people like Al Menconi are really ignorant, when you review a game, it is for the content, and by content I mean the quality of a game. Pretty much 80 percent of all christians I know arent idiots like Al Menconi who are so narrow minded, the average games on the pulse of gamers everywhere have things like Violence, Sex, and swearing. And heres the one that pisses me off the most.... Any game with magic immediately gets kicked out so far because it has "occult" themes, your so narrow minded it isn't even funny. A fantasy game is called a fantasy because of just that, it is make believe, Christians say sins drag people in because it feels good to sin, well if your playing a game where you sin, isn't that better because your so juiced up from those games that you won't do it in real life? I say games discourage folks to kill, maim, bludgeon et cetera, I won't even go into the pre-marital sex deal. But you need to be open minded and respect the fact that you aren't in our world, or even universe in most of these games. Please Wake the hell up. Email me with any questions or comments at icefox922@hotmail.com Posted by: JT on April 19, 2004 06:14 PMLOL, somehow I doubt few people will be writing you to discuss your insightful opinions. Posted by: MR on June 12, 2004 05:46 PMPost a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (24) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (18) Design (6) Economics (5) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (15) Music (17) News (15) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (13) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (45) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |