Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
May 21, 2003
No FrE3dom for French Press
Reporters sans frontières is protesting on behalf of some videogame journalists who were detained and deported from Los Angeles as they were en route to report on E3 last week: "Six French journalists detained on arrival at Los Angeles, sent back to France." Journalists who cover videogames would seem to have it easy - gameplaying, junkets, exciting events. But here's a rude bit of geopolitics and paranoia for them to cover. I wonder if they will report on the experience themselves? Alexandre Alfonsi of Télé 7 Jours, Stéphanie Pic of Télé Poche and Michel Perrot of TV Hebdo, Thierry Falcoz, editor in chief of Game One cable television, and two of his cameramen, Laurent Patureau and Alex Gorsky - I apologize to you on behalf of my government. From Ben at Serious Games. Posted by justin at May 21, 2003 02:48 PM | TrackBackComments
OK, from this it sounds like they were detained and sent back to France because of visa problems. The issue is where, again? Do we have reports that other journalists with similar visa problems were allowed through? IOW, is there ANYTHING other than conjecture that says they were targeted because they were French? (not rhetorical, BTW. I'd just like more information before I go jumping down TSA's throat on this one.) Posted by: Sal M on May 21, 2003 04:06 PMI dunno... do visa problems warrant SIX body searches? Seems really over-board, and quite sickening. Posted by: nowak on May 21, 2003 05:53 PMWhile I am French and I am aware of the stupid discrimination that has been going on in the States against the same guys who gave them the Statue of Liberty as a present, I must clarify an important thing. When you enter the States as a French (or European), you have to fill a green "visa waiver" form, where it clearly states that you do not need a visa as long as you are not in the country as a news reporter for a foreign news company. Since I never entered to the country as a reporter, I never paid attention to it. Even if the body searches are definitively an excess, I must admit that the text on the forms is quite clear. Were the guys held because they were French? The answer is probably yes. Should journalists be allowed to cover whatever they want? Of course, yes. But technically, the gov had legal grounds to deny their entry (well, of course the law stopped being applied in the States at the moment Bush gave a coup d'etat and people lost the right to public trials and a long etcetera, but that's another story). It still sucks that these guys were sent back, since this doesn't help the relationship with France and the States -and my fellow Frenchmen could not enjoy the E3 coverage. Merde! Posted by: Gonzalo on May 21, 2003 06:56 PMSal and Gonzalo, you make good points. This story caught my eye because of other recent singling out and abuses I've read about as Americans try to balance safety and respect. Also, I've been a travelling journalist and I've had to fill out forms and decide what level of disclosure to follow - when I was going back and forth to Japan, being a freelance journalist was tough. But if these guys were green, then they may not have been following the right rules and regulations. It's strange that a few got through, and not all of them. And the searching seems a bit extreme. I still want to hear from them! Posted by: justin on May 21, 2003 11:32 PMit also sounds as though only one of each group had a visa issue, and the others were detained when they were trying to find out what happened to their colleague. technically, i believe any nation reserves the right to refuse entry to anybody for any reason. it's just sad when that discretionary power is used in what seems an unjust case. Posted by: jane on May 21, 2003 11:38 PMI'm very impressed that you picked up this article. Here's a really good breakdown on the incident and its ramifications: http://www.reason.com/links/links052003.shtml I was never a huge fan on how the Dept. of Homeland Security came into being in the first place, and lately it seems as though its powers can and will be abused for political purposes (e.g., hunting down missing Texan Democrats). As far as the E3 connection to homeland security - well, I didn't see that one coming. Keep up the good work! Posted by: Handel on May 22, 2003 07:38 AMI though the decision to deport them was merely stupid until I saw the list of other countries that do the same thing in Handel's link. Now it looks downright criminal. When did the "all men are born equal with inalienable rights (e.g., freedom of the press)" from my American history classes suddenly define "men" as "U.S. Citizens Only"? Posted by: ragmana on May 25, 2003 08:55 AMAt the time, "men" likely meant property-owning white American males. Posted by: defenestrati on June 6, 2003 11:13 PMmaybe they were detained for visa problems? and if not? do i care? sadly no....and skippy brings up a interesting point...french people gave us a statue and then we had some fun with them in vietnam....wait it wasnt fun....hahah oh the irony. Posted by: exeter blue on July 10, 2003 01:55 PMThink simple. Learn different. Macinstruct.net Posted by: Geoffrey on July 6, 2004 07:29 AMThink simple. Learn different. Macinstruct.net Posted by: Geoffrey on July 6, 2004 07:31 AMPost a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |