Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
July 01, 2003
Gaming's Lester Bangs
Michael Goldberg sat across the table for me at a lunch with cloth napkins. He was full of energy talking about a new web site, "Addicted to Noise." It was 1995 and he wanted to use web publishing to salute and chronicle Rock and Roll. He had a guiding spirit in this undertaking - Lester Bangs. I was 20 years old. I didn't know. Who was Lester Bangs? Only the greatest rock writer ever, Michael raved. I started rereading some of his essays last night. His writing is filled with so much passion, so much of a yearning to transmit music on paper, so much unflinching desire to see rock and roll really rock, to ditch the weak sauce, to leave behind half-baked follow-ons, to relentlessly keep a strong pulse. Lester Bangs wrote freelance for Rolling Stone in its earliest days. And for music magazines when they were more like zines; thin pages, created and photocopied by fans of new music. So where is the Lester Bangs of game writing? Where is a game critic who writes reviews and essays suffused with the feeling of long evenings on the couch, or hunched over in your chair attacking orcs and covenant forces and levelling up and all that goes into a long dark personal play experience? Saluting the mystic savagery of time spent in the screen. Lester Bangs didn't profit much from his excess in prose. But he did benchmark a certain ecstacy for living in media. Maybe the inspirational critic to salute games is today toiling for some small fan sites. Maybe he or she will pass away quietly in a pile of cartridges; and I'll be reading their compilation offline in years to come. But I'd rather hear about them now - anyone got any suggestions? Maybe it's Chet and Eric, but they've stopped publishing Old Man Murray. Sean writes here and there and mostly makes me laugh and marvel at his extensive knowledge of history and absurdity. He dwells on failure in games; spending so much time on disappointment and idiocy of the medium: there's not the religious sense that games have the power to transform suffusing his words. That's something that gives Bangs longer legs I think - his faith in rock and roll attracts people who want to believe. Who writes for the believers in games? Posted by justin at July 01, 2003 05:49 PM | TrackBackComments
I think it was Lum the Mad, aka Scott Jennings. Unlike Lester Bangs, though, he crossed over and joined the creatives. Posted by: Raph on July 1, 2003 07:40 PMI'm just trying to find some webhosting and how the hell to use Movable Type (and not be somehow lessened as a person). Then, all your dreams will come true! Posted by: Christian McCrea on July 1, 2003 11:34 PMI'm just trying to find some webhosting and how the hell to use Movable Type (and not be somehow lessened as a person). Then, all your dreams will come true! Posted by: Christian McCrea on July 1, 2003 11:34 PMHmm, I'd agree with you about the guys from OMM. Why did they stop writing, anyway? Posted by: chris on July 1, 2003 11:46 PMI don't know about 'the Lester Bangs of video games' or whatever (no one ever says "Lester Bangs was the Pauline Kael of music journalism"), and I only really have experience of UK games journo's but I allways enjoy reading Stuart Campbell stuff check out the archive on his web site for an extensive selection of his writings I read Stephen Poole's column in Edge where he expands on topics he covered in Trigger Happy (he does good book reviews in the guardian too). Tom There will never be a Lester Bangs of gaming, because gaming is a bourgeois activity. It encourages people to stay home and tune out. Rock is more or less the same way these days, but that's a different argument. I'm just in a bad mood today, don't mind me. Posted by: misuba on July 2, 2003 03:52 PMVery romantic aritcle. Nicely written, but I have to say I much prefer discussing games with other gamers on web forums / chats than listening to anything any dim witted 'reviewer' has to say. Game reviewers are all goons. 'Nuff said. Posted by: ZYirAH on July 2, 2003 05:16 PMThis is a wonderful idea, but if games were worthy, they would have attracted such critics already. You can't just make a plea, "Hey fanboys, learn how to write! Infuse us with the conviction that games are art and not just a kind of mental masturbation!" Alright, that's a bit extreme, but you have to have artists before you can have critics. I mean, a lot of artists. And not just a bunch of programmers and technicians. And they'll have to make an actual New Game Idea(tm). But like I've said all over the place, people don't play games to get insight or to experience aesthetics, they play to indulge in their personal fantasies of power. Take the narcissism out of games and then maybe we'll have a chance and the critics will pay attention. Posted by: Brent on July 2, 2003 09:23 PMOh I don't know. I think I could name dozens of games that are, unquestionably, art. Posted by: ZYirAH on July 2, 2003 10:05 PMI might get laughed out of town for this, but the most passionate writing I've seen lately has been on Penny Arcade. I think if Tycho harnessed his energy into more coherent and focused essays, he would produce the kind of stuff you're talking about. Or not. Posted by: rob on July 2, 2003 10:29 PMI'm going to have to agree with Rob here. Penny Arcade is the voice of my generation. The reason they have such a fanatical devoted following isn't just because of the pretty pictures Gabe draws, it's just what lures them in. Tycho's posts and reviews are what I stay for. Sure he tends to write "fuck" a lot and sometimes goes off on a tangent, but I consider him arguably the best "Lester Bangs" candidate out there. Posted by: Jia on July 2, 2003 11:11 PMI'd have to say the comics themselves are what have always held my interest. I remember when they posted this one at loony-games. I laughed out loud in my cubicle. Only one other person in the whole office even got the joke. That kind of hard core humor just can't be found anywhere else. To me, the Lester Bangs of video games is Tom Chick. I could probably me-too the accolades of Penny Arcade. I'd also point out that misuba's point about games encouraging people to stay home and tune out doesn't seem to take into account LAN parties, which are group social experiences that exist only because of gaming, and can involve quite large groups. There are also the odd tournaments (such as the recent Penny Arcade Soul Calibur 2 tourney). Perhaps our mythical game critic demi-god will arise from these circles? On that note, perhaps Gaming's Lester Banks is currently writing in Korean? Posted by: ClockworkGrue on July 3, 2003 08:05 AMThere are people trying to be more 'serious' about gaming culture, like the folks at Joysticks101, but they still haven't really succeeded. After thinking about it, I'd have to agree with most folks here, Tycho from PA is probably one of the best game writers (and sometimes general purpose writers) around. When he gets descriptive, you can easily see what he's talking about in your mind's eye. Being a gaming writer (or goon as someone called us all ) it's a tough deal trying to write material outside of reviews, news and previews. Why? Because everytime we do, we get flamed by readers for having an opinion they don't share, or not covering such and such LAN fest, obscure game or whatever, or many writers fear that if they talked about the real world of games, most people would tune out. Lester's articles reached out to everyone, not just gamers, and right now, game writing is all about games and gamers, and the rest of the world really doesn't care that much to hear about the late night gaming fests, controller flinging moments or days spent in anticipation of patches and new releases. We can make it as flowery as we want, but that's generally what it boils down to. Posted by: Quietmob on July 3, 2003 05:45 PMI have to admit that I don't get penny-arcade, I don't find the comics funny and the writing, though fluid and passionate, isn't exactly insightful. Obviously a lot of people love it so if anyone can point me in the direction of some particularly enlightening posts I'd be glad to reappraise. Posted by: tom p on July 4, 2003 01:37 AMI don't think PA is terribly "deep," it's just that they say what's on their mind, and they do it with a punk-ish flair you won't find anywhere else. And the part I think is the funniest about Penny Arcade, is that they can rip the heck out of a company's games (Microsoft especially), yet still that same company continually ships them new games to try in desperate hope of getting it mentioned. Microsoft even shows them new games up at the Redmond campus, which, many the PA crew has then shredded (the games) in a later post. It's a cool little pseudo-subversive vibe. They shred "the man", and yet "the man" still begs for their attention. (Sorry, that sounds terribly hippie-70's, but better wording escapes me right now, my mind is slowed by barbeque food and apple pie). But I don't think people will be saying "man, Tycho's writing was what gaming is about" ten years from now when they've both retired the comic and gone on to other things. But right now, it's still the best gaming stuff around. Posted by: Quietmob on July 4, 2003 08:28 PMtim rogers Posted by: C on December 12, 2003 11:51 PMtim rogers Posted by: C on December 12, 2003 11:52 PMThink simple. Learn different. Macinstruct.net Posted by: Hugh on July 6, 2004 06:59 AMThink simple. Learn different. Macinstruct.net Posted by: Hugh on July 6, 2004 07:01 AMPost a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |