Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
July 21, 2003
Xbox Vote of Confidence on GameFAQs
Before today, in months of scanning, I have never seen an Xbox game listed on the front page of GameFAQs.com as one of the Top 10 FAQ pages. GameFAQs aggregates fan-provided hints and tip-sheets for games. It's indispensible for fans of story-driven or plot-oriented titles, role-playing games, adventures. If you're trying to find a hidden house in Skies of Arcadia, you can't get past the Russian guards on the second level of Splinter Cell, or you're trying to figure out how exactly to create the optimal character for Summoner, some fan has solved the game, solved it again, and solved it a third time, taking detailed notes on the secrets and tricks they used. Not all games get this treatment, however - only games that have dedicated fans, and dedicated players hoping for hints. Scanning the top ten requested games on GameFAQs is a good way to see what people are playing (it's how I first heard of Animal Crossing). So it's been telling that Xbox hasn't had any games that are popular in this way - Nintendo, PlayStation and PC dominate the ranks. That is, until BioWare's Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic - currently ranked the number one most popular FAQ on GameFAQs. Jane and I are addicted, wrestling for control of the controller (actually we're under deadline and not playing it much at all. But we think about it often!). It's the first Xbox game I've seen Jane play for more than twenty minutes. Knights of the Old Republic is a great game with perfect appeal for a console role-player. The game meets the pent-up demand of gamers who haven't yet been able to harnass their Xbox for an epic adventure. Those players won't find many hints in the GameFAQs page for SW: KNOTR, there's only a few slim user-generated FAQ files there so far. By my count, it's taken over 18 months for an Xbox title to generate an active users-helping-users community. Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic looks like a strong long-term vote of confidence in the Xbox platform. What will Bioware do next? And what platform will it be on? Posted by justin at July 21, 2003 06:02 PM | TrackBackComments
FYI, BioWare just loaded tons of info on easter eggs, level walkthroughs and other goodies up at their web site: http://www.bioware.com/games/knights_old_republic/game_info/game_secrets/ (You need to set up a free user account) Jason Posted by: Jason Della Rocca on July 21, 2003 08:26 PMGood to know that people are playing it, but I'm still holding out for the PC version... Posted by: Thad on July 22, 2003 10:12 AMI'm not surprised at all at the response this game has garnered. It's Star Wars and a Bioware RPG for god's sake! But beyond all that, it's a fantastic game. Everyone has their own opinions about what makes a good RPG and what gives them the emotional resonance and gameplay that makes them classics, but I'll take this title over anything I've played RPGwise on the other 2 consoles (unbelievable, but true!). It's nice to see another Xbox game that approaches the quality and fun of a Halo. Posted by: arlovegas on July 22, 2003 10:26 AMDoes anyone else find it silly that KOTOR takes place thousands of years before the films? I know it's sci-fi, and that's usually seen as a license to create absolutely anything... but imagine a person of today holding a conversation with a person from the year 1000AD. One thousands years makes a hell of a difference. Either the Star Wars Universe is completely stagnated (both in technology and evolution) or Lucas is willing to sign off on anything these days. Posted by: Joe on July 22, 2003 12:08 PMIt's kinda sad that we've had to wait almost two years for an Xbox game of this quality. Halo was fantastic, then everything after it was just either ok or terrible. There's been nothing amazing for the Xbox in some time until Kotor. Posted by: Quietmob on July 22, 2003 12:11 PMMy GF and I have a total of three games running on it. Mine (good girl), mine (evil guy), and hers (good girl). Interesting to see the AD&D rules wrapped around the SW universe. Posted by: zaius on July 22, 2003 02:08 PMIt's great to see that not only is BioWare making hordes of new fans with KOTOR, but also that it's an RPG that's true to their particular style. (Their only previous foray into console games was MDK2) As for your question, the next thing they're going to finish is KOTOR for the PC. Then, they'll release Hordes of the Underdark, the second Neverwinter Nights expansion. After that... They're not saying, yet. They tend to keep their projects tightly wrapped until they're good and ready. The bad side, they only have a port and an expansion on the visible horizon, the good side, I've yet to see BioWare cancel an announced project. Two mega-hits in a row, cheers BioWare! Here's hoping KOTOR X-box gets some folks into Neverwinter Nights, maybe even the mod scene... Posted by: Diosamblet on July 23, 2003 03:40 AMI have to agree with Quietmob - it's a pity that games of this quality only seem to come out every year or two for the XBox. But I'm thankful for the quality of this game in itself, and if it takes a couple years to produce games like these for the XBox, I see it as being no different than the two years I have to wait for a Star Wars sequel. Also, due to the sheer amount of activities that this one game has, I'm glad that nothing else is distracting me from it. Posted by: Nicho on July 23, 2003 07:30 AMRe: Joe's comment. Personally, I don't find the 1000 year gap to be silly at all. I think it's a realistic scale actually. Think of it this way: In regards to our small, young planet we measure events and history in terms of centuries. So it seems quite valid for a sci-fi universe to measure events taking place across entire galaxies in terms of millenia. Posted by: ZYirAH on July 23, 2003 10:15 AMJust read the review on gameforms.com and they say it's actually 4000 years prior to the films. ZYirAh, I don't have a problem with the timeframe as it relates to plot and/or epic events... just that I have trouble accepting that humans and aliens of 4000 years ago can look identical to humans and aliens of today. I guess KOTOR is coming out against natural biological evolution! But like I said, it's sci-fi, so anything goes. Alternate universe, not technically Earth humans, blah blah blah. This just strikes me as much more fiction than science. Especially since the Star Wars movies/books have always tried to keep things more grounded in physical reality than most sci-fi properties. Posted by: Joe on July 23, 2003 10:40 AMI kind of find it hard to believe that Halo was never in the top 10 faq pages (although maybe that's because everyone was busy playing the living daylights out of it.) My roommate used to have an Xbox, and I am considering purchasing one to play KOTOR, not to mention halo2 when it comes out, or project gotham 2. Methinks 2004 could be the year of the Xbox. Posted by: Conrad on July 23, 2003 12:03 PM"just that I have trouble accepting that humans and aliens of 4000 years ago can look identical to humans and aliens of today. I guess KOTOR is coming out against natural biological evolution!" this is totally off the record, hush, hush and on the qt: king tut had a tail! Posted by: md on July 24, 2003 04:34 AMBioware is a first party developer for Microsoft, wouldn't they stick with the Xbox for their next game? Posted by: Stephen on July 24, 2003 10:22 AMBioware is a first party developer for Microsoft, wouldn't they stick with the Xbox for their next game? Posted by: Stephen on July 24, 2003 10:23 AMIn response to the "thousands of years silliness". It's perfectly plausible that biological evolution isn't taking effect in the Star Wars universe. Consider this, the bigger civilizations get the lesser they tend to evolve. With more and more people saturating the gene pool it's only logical that a species would get to a certain evolutionary point and stagnate. Scientists are saying that hunams on earth probably won't evolve much more if we can keep our way of life stable, and that the only thing that would prompt evolutionary change with humans would be some sort of global catastrophe or disaster. Granted, we don't even know how long all the different species of the Star Wars universe have been cohabitating, so 4,000 years difference may not even mean much at all to them. :) Posted by: Mechanical6 on July 25, 2003 02:02 PM"By my count, it's taken over 18 months for an Xbox title to generate an active users-helping-users community" Didn't you just use Splinter Cell as an example? Was there no active community around that until it was ported? Posted by: 5000! on July 25, 2003 05:35 PMWith regards to the 4,000 year comments. I can see how some people might find it to be a little to large of a time difference. However, if you get into the expanded universe of star wars much, you'll see that it explains a lot of the past that is often referred to in the novels, comics, etc. For example, it shows us the sith war. It explains a lot about mandelorians. If I'm not mistaken, jango fett was a madelorian. Although 4,000 years may seem a little TOO far in the past, they had to set it back far enough for the sith to exist. In case you might not remember, in star wars episode I, the council comments how the sith have been extinct for a milenia. Posted by: Rob on September 30, 2003 10:02 PMthe sith are extinct as a species even in kotor. the sith of kotor are merely followers of the sith ideal. stagnation of technological and evoltuionary changes happen over time. not to mention the setbacks faced in major galactic wars that preceded and followed our little chunk of time in kotor. several wars following the timeperiod kotor was set in resulted in several spans of time that could almost be equated with dark ages. two such wars occured directly before the beginning of this game. the war with exar kun and the mandalorian war. there were even worse following. ones in which the jedi themselves were so concerned with survival, that the ideals of the order were sacrificed merely to insure the survival of the group. i am pretty sure events such as these would probably slow down technological advancements. when your only concern is staying alive, you don't have as much time to ponder improvements on technology. but largely i think the major advancements between kotor, and epsiode 1 deal with the expanding of hyperspace routes. in kotor times much of the galaxy is still unexplored. but regardless of all this, i saw an obvious attempt to downgrade technology. compare the ebon hawk to the millenium falcon. or your utility droid (t3-44 or whatever his designation) to r2-d2. i think they did a fairly good job in making technology look older. Posted by: lost on December 27, 2003 08:24 PMPost a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (25) Advertising (3) Art (22) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (17) Design (4) Economics (4) Entertainment (19) Events (64) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (2) Fun (16) Gender (25) Humor (32) Jane's Journal (71) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (14) Music (14) News (15) People (37) Politics (41) Preview (4) Research (12) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (44) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |