Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
October 14, 2003
Welcome to my World
I'm in the process now of putting together an adventure in a brand-new world which I will administer as Game Mistress. The activity consumes my energy. I have started maps, NPC descriptions, historical appendices, character and location sketches. It's the kind of thing I love to do - get all snarky with the details. But I've never done it before. Sure, when I was a kid, I wrote a series of fantasy adventures that took place in an invented world - but that was all for me. Now I'm supposed to allow other people in who might very well change the way things are! I wanted some help. So I asked some people for advice, but I also found a great deal of helpful material at Burning Void, which is geared towards publishing your adventure but contains a rich store of good advice, nearly all of it written by Heather Grove. Ms. Grove believes passionately in free will - that is, the players' playing the game rather than the GM's telling a story. The story should be something that emerges from play. I relaly love that idea. Who knows what could happen? So although the novelist part of me balks at losing narrative control, the obsessive-compulsive detail freak in me revels at the thought of packing in the possibilities. The play space will be Victorian/steampunk, in the middle of an industrial and technological revolution. So there will be all sorts of tensions and potential conflicts. Will my players become rich capitalists? Will they join the workers' cause? Will they fall in with bandits and highwaymen? Will they become arms smugglers or diplomats? Inventors or saboteurs? Or something I haven't even thought of yet? Posted by jane at October 14, 2003 10:14 AM | TrackBackComments
natsukashii... Posted by: zaius on October 14, 2003 10:37 AMThis should really be a great experinece for your players and hopefully for you as well! Posted by: sollyz on October 14, 2003 11:51 AMIf you're GM'ing for the first time, I think some good tips might be found here: http://www.roleplayingtips.com/current_issue.asp Also, if your players are gaming for the first time as well, you might wish to direct them here: http://www.roleplayingtips.com/issue187.asp#4 and here: http://www.roleplayingtips.com/issue187.asp#6 Yes, I'm a geek. Yes, I figured, for non-rpg'ing geeks who wanted to get into rpg'ing geekdom, I'd give a push in a certain direction. Hope you enjoy =D Posted by: Jonathan on October 14, 2003 01:01 PMOh, yeah: And much luck GM'ing. It's a tough job. http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05032002.html (That particular episode isn't as funny as the whole, but I'm sure you get the point)(or will, at any rate). Posted by: Jonathan on October 14, 2003 01:07 PMI have been in campaigns that have been both overly story driven and overly character driven. My experience is that the best adventure can be found in a very delicate balance between the two. Also, the amount of players in the campaign is somewhat of a slider. The more characters, the more the story must lead the party. With four or less characters, you can leave a pretty open storyline. The main drawback to this is the preparedness of the GM. Leaving to many avenues for the party to travel can make you look like you are bumbling around for a plotline. What separates the good GM's from the great ones is the ability to give the party options, but not let them surprise you with their choices. Posted by: DiaBoLus on October 14, 2003 02:47 PMi agree that gm'ing is very difficult, especially if you allow the players a lot of freedom in their actions. there've been plenty of times where certain players will go off on a tangent that i was unprepared for, causing me to either force them back to into the game i was planning on, or making up new plotlines to accomodate their actions. of course, some of the best games i've played came about from unexpected actions taken by the players. Posted by: charley on October 15, 2003 10:25 AMHere are my two cents worth as an experienced game player and game master. There are a few things that can really spoil the fun of role-playing. One of the main things is bad group dynamics. With as much as you are investing of your time and mind on the campaign you are putting together you will want to make sure that you like all of the people you are inviting to play and that within that group there isn't any major conflicts that will inappropiatly come out in the game. Freedom of choice. As a player I love to have at least the same amount of freedom in a game that I have now in real life. In both there should be consequences. If I, in real life, choose to stay home playing video games and miss work then I am going to obviously not get payed for that day and if I don't give proper notice, even if that is faking being sick, then I could lose my job. But if it were a game and the Game Master(GM) wanted me to go to work because it was pivital for me to be in a car wreck to meet a major NPC then I just screwed up the plot by staying home. The best GM's are those that can roll with the multitude of unexpected punches that the players will throw and come up with plot changes on the fly. When I design a plot what I do is determine who my villian(s) will be and just exactly what they are trying to do. The villian doesn't even have to be a living thing. It can be anything that is a conflict for the players, like a tornado, a sinking ship, and so on. And the best villians are those that we can identify with, or at least understand their motivation. Such as the Wicked Witch from Wizard of Oz. If you killed my sister and stole the family shoes I'd be after your ass too, but that doesn't make me the bad guy. Make sure to know your villian(s) inside and out. This will allow you to decide what they will do when your players enter into their world. This way all I need to really have planned is those first few encounters and the world where all of this stuff is taking place. After that the players will have to figure out how to stop the villian, or in some cases the villian will be after the players and they have to figure out how to hide and stay alive. There also needs to be a very real sense of danger. Even if you plan to not allow any of your player's characters to die, because as GM you do hold that power, don't let your players know this. Lie to them. Tell them as they are making their characters up, "It is quite possible these characters are going to die in this story. I am warning you now because I don't want to hear you whine about it if and when it happens." Lastly, it is ultimatly the players actions, or even inactions that will determine the outcome of an adventure. Not all stories have happy endings. In fact, some of the best stories don't have happy endings. As a GM our job is to guide the entertainment but not force it. Good luck on this. When it gets rolling maybe you can post updates on the adventure. Our maybe one of the players will volunteer to do a journel, in charecter if possible, and allow you to post it. ooo, how exciting. :D keep us posted. are you going to go cheapass games route and self-publish the game? or is that the last thing from your mind at the moment? ;3 Posted by: manpurse on October 17, 2003 06:26 PMjpb ppyt psycholog zdrowa żywność nieruchomości projektowanie stron agencja reklamowa soczewki kontaktowe nauka angielskiego agroturystyka opony klimatyzacja domy opieki akupunktura hydraulik projektowanie wnętrz soha jpk paa ki wypadki tfrd jh sw jft pp fdr Posted by: outsider on April 11, 2006 07:33 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |