Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
October 29, 2003
WSJ reports that women DO play games
"Where the Girls Are" article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday suggests that the game industry is waking up to the commercial possibilities of paying attention to the growing female market. Some numbers provided by the Entertainment Software Association in the article are interesting: 26% of electronic game-players are women over 18. The article also notes that "For the holidays this year, Codemasters says it will run its most aggressive U.S. ad campaign ever, placing print ads in magazines including CosmoGirl, YM, Teen People and Working Mother. The multimillion-dollar campaign also features TV spots set to start airing next month on the WB network, during "7th Heaven," "Smallville" and other shows popular with young women and girls." There are also a few paragraphs on There, the open-ended virtual space that is designed to attract more women. iVillage ("the internet for women") has a special deal with There, Inc. whereby it will be able to provide ads and services in a special iVillage zone. I wonder if all this mainstream feminizing of gamespaces will alienate the original women who colonized them. Current female gamers may be disgusted by the fact that they can now get astrology and love advice in their gaming. Will we see an increasing divide between the female old guard "OG" - original gamer - and the fluffy newbie lured in by Cosmo quizzes and virtual fashion design aspirations? [Thanks to Wayne and Mike Spriggs for the article!] Posted by jane at October 29, 2003 07:42 AM | TrackBackComments
We talked about the ESA numbers awhile ago on GGA. The problem with the numbers is that they will not release information about the questions that they asked to come up with those figures. That makes the figures very useful for marketting purposes (and maybe telling girls that girls play will get more girls to play through the magic of peer pressure and normativeness) but totally useless for factual purposes. What counts as a gamer? Is my roommate one? She plays Zelda a lot, so probably yes. What about my Mom? She's tried mine sweeper a few times. What about my ex? She plays Tetris on her eight year-old Mac, exclusively. What about some of my students who play some of the free web games? No one knows and the ESA isn't saying (unless things have changed). Speaking of There, I have downloaded the free trial and I would suggest that everyone interested in customer service check it out. It has been the most userfriendly experience of my short life. They hold your hand through every step of the process, even suggesting that you hold off registering until such a time as their customer service reps will be there (ahem) to greet you. Posted by: Snowmit on October 29, 2003 09:27 AMI would suspect that as the market grows it will change such that producers of games will appeal to different aspect of the female gaming market. I will be very interested to see how producers respond to initial forays into making games for women, especially if they aren't successful. If women are playing games already I would think that they are at least somewhat compelled by games that are currently on the market. In addition to potential tensions with OGs...I'd think we're going to get some really "interesting" game offerings based on that data. Posted by: cpgecko on October 29, 2003 09:29 AM"26% of electronic game-players are women over 18. There are more 18+ women playing these games than 6-17 yr old males? Baloney. Sliced baloney with sharp mustard and lettuce, on a fresh hero roll. Also... "I wonder if all this mainstream feminizing of gamespaces will alienate the original women who colonized them." Which would make said women alienated gamespace colonizers? Jane, you're a better writer than this. Please spare us the faux-academic crit-speak. Not that I mean to marginalize your discourse, you understand. ;) Posted by: Brain From Arous on October 29, 2003 12:39 PMI still shake my head & wonder why, in the 21st century, society still clings to notions of "boys do this, girls do that." What nonsense. I would love to meet whoever makes these stupid rules up. "I wonder if all this mainstream feminizing of gamespaces will alienate the original women who colonized them." I'm a medium OG (been playing for about 7 years). I would think (hope) that sites/magazines I read regularly now wouldn't change. I think where you'll see the biggest change is in places that don't even address games now (i.e. articles on gaming popping up in Cosmo, etc.) These articles will probably be gaming light, but since I don't read these mags/visit their sites, I don't care! I'm also not too optimistic about the chances of any good games coming from the idea of developing a game targeted to women. I don't read Danielle Steele or watch Lifetime (I find this station particularly offensive as they advertise themselves as, "Television for women"; then proceed to show movie after movie of rape, incest,etc. I can't stand this stuff). With all that said, I think they'll probably make a ton of money off said games if they make them. I'm more into things that are targeted at noone in particular. Just made with the best effort to be good. Like Disgaea. Also can't wait for the new "Gunslinger" book by Stephen King. This OG will just keep on keeping on, doods. If it gets too bad, I'll get my Prinnies to attack!! Posted by: Jbumi on October 29, 2003 04:13 PMwho cares about focusing on capturing the new girl games market? in 50 years, everyone* who doesn't play games will be dead. a persnickety game veteran said that to me once and i want to believe it. having spent the last 10 days with some of the brightest fems in gaming and techonology (big ups to jane, robin and jee) i think, it's a *good* thing for more girls to get into gaming even if it's peddled in shallow rags. i don't care if they're full-time, part-time or barely-anytime players so long as they find some joy in playing. *everyone meaning, anyone that has access to games today who choose not to play them. i know indigenious tribes in the outback might not be mashing joysticks in 50 years. Posted by: souris on October 29, 2003 04:46 PMEven if i am skeptical about the numbers, at least there are numbers coming in. (as i said in a comment regarding the gender and gaming article). I do wonder how they get these numbers... but whatever the case... maybe this will spark a little more interest in female gamers! I realize that this is gameGIRLadvance, but I am consistently amazed by the total lack of attention given to race of videogame players. It seems that there is more and more about gender (and that is a good thing) but I have yet to see even one quantitative study about the races of people playing videogames in America (or any other country for that matter). Posted by: bryan young on October 30, 2003 06:16 AMbryan, you're absolutely right. how many African-American game developers are there? i can think of one. ONE. sometimes on this site we discuss cultural issues - for example, Bowler's recent post about Iraqui gamers; or the discussion of the Under Ash game developed by Syrian designers which is meant to tell the story of the Palestinian cause. i have not seen any numbers about the ethnicities of gamers and how they break down. has anyone? Posted by: jane on October 30, 2003 08:18 AMjpb ppyt psycholog zdrowa żywność nieruchomości projektowanie stron agencja reklamowa soczewki kontaktowe nauka angielskiego agroturystyka opony klimatyzacja domy opieki akupunktura hydraulik projektowanie wnętrz soha jpk paa ki wypadki tfrd jh sw jft pp fdr Posted by: outsider on April 11, 2006 07:43 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (25) Advertising (3) Art (22) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (17) Design (4) Economics (4) Entertainment (19) Events (64) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (2) Fun (16) Gender (25) Humor (32) Jane's Journal (71) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (14) Music (14) News (15) People (37) Politics (41) Preview (4) Research (12) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (44) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |