game girl advance
Name: E-mail:
Google GGA:

Print this post
January 27, 2004
Hiking In The DMZ

I thought that some GGA readers might find interesting a recent public spectacle on MacRumors, a site, as the moniker boldly suggests, dedicated to news and rumors about Apple's Mac platform and the company's peripheral products and services, as well as the technologies behind these items. A news item discussion about Xbox 2 and possible 65 nanometer process IBM microprocessors or some such double-E nonsense -- apologies to EE track students and professionals; you people are a cut above, really -- quickly devolved into a console wars thread replete with thinly veiled, censor-evading expletives in the vein of "Xbox is sh**!" and "GameCube is for p**sies!"

Being a Mac site, Microsoft's Xbox caught the bulk of incoming heavy weapons fire, but PlayStation 2 and Nintendo's signature console did not escape unscathed. Two points about this lengthy combative discussion amazed me: one, the allegiance to a particular console is so great that individuals can't see the strengths and weaknesses of all currently shipping models; and secondly, the notion that just because one does not prefer their computer operating system software, Microsoft is incapable of producing revolutionary or even valuable evolutionary products.

For my part, I am a Mac user. A dedicated Mac user. I'm not comfortable using Windows. This may have to do with the fact that I have always been a Mac user, or possibly because Windows is sh**! Regardless, from the moment I unpacked my Xbox -- a few precious minutes of delicious excitement -- I was, the overall size, weight and unspectacular aesthetics notwithstanding, greatly impressed with the device as a gaming platform. Superior graphics; hard drive for capacious storage; adequate controller -- though I prefer the S-type model; expansion capability for DVD movie playback; Halo; the whole works. And this from a company that had no prior track record in mass producing consumer electronics hardware.

Microsoft did a few smart things with Xbox. They built a viable, even superior, gaming console from off-the-shelf parts, structured from the ground up a process for mass producing these devices, and they bought Bungie and with it Halo: instant killer app. Xbox Live, in my opinion, is vastly superior to the almost nonexistent online capabilities of GameCube and the discordant functions of same on PS2 -- both Japanese models requiring additional hardware if not subscription fees.

This is not to say that I don't have a healthy fondness for my GameCube and PlayStation 2, but Xbox is hardly a lame dog and indeed often dominates much of my play time. What strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess.

And all this carping issued forth from a blurb about a rumored new computer chip design...

Posted by San at January 27, 2004 03:57 AM | TrackBack
Comments

What strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess.

That may be how Mac users see themselves, but the rest of the world sees them a little differently. Mac heads have always had a tendency to fall into a reality distortion field... I used to be a Mac user (learned C programming on a Mac Plus way back when) but now primarily use Linux and it's great fun to see my family (Mac-users, all) start frothing at the mouth any time I praise Microsoft. Mac users may think they are rational but they are nothing of the sort. And you know what? Microsoft Windows is not all that bad.

Posted by: eli on January 27, 2004 08:41 AM

If there were no Mac OS X -- or no Mac before that -- I would use Windows, or Linux or Solaris or whatever. But there is a Mac OS X and it is, in my opinion, much better than Windows. But, no, Windows is not all that bad. There's not a thing I do with my Mac that I could not in some way do with Windows; I just do it somewhat differently on the Mac.

Yes, unfortunately in any issue of fealty, "discerning and enlightened" is often merely synonymous with "zealot".

Posted by: san on January 27, 2004 09:52 AM

ya gotta understand something (as i post from a giant macintosh) - evangelists of any stripe come off as looney to the uninitiated. mac evangelists are much like scientologist evangelists, imo; frothy and and struggling to convince themselves the few thousand they just laid out was worth it.

Posted by: dhex on January 27, 2004 10:57 AM

I thought Apple took a serious step backwards from usability when they released OSX. Previously their main selling point had been the OS's intuitiveness. Now they have dumped intuitiveness and are advertising the fact that their boxes are "faster" than Wintel boxes. (Remember all the zealotry about "Mhz doesn't mean anything"?) Microsoft and Apple have almost switched places, advertising and focus-wise.

This discussion makes me want to dig the Mac Plus out of the closet and play a game of Dark Castle...

Posted by: eli on January 27, 2004 11:01 AM

I am a former Mac sysadmin, but now use PCs because everyone else does, and I have no mind of my own. I doseem to have somewhat of an IBM Thinkpad fetish as well - I'm on #5. I kinda view the Mac/PC debate in a similar vein to the San Francisco/LA debate - everyone in San Francisco hates LA, and everyone in LA thinks San Francisco is a fine place to visit, and doesn't really care what they think.

Posted by: drew on January 27, 2004 11:13 AM

What strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess.

Please be careful not to lump all Mac users together. What you are witnessing is Internet Zealotry Syndrome, available for all products on message boards across the web. Macs vs. PCs, Xbox vs. PS2 vs. GameCube, Ratchet and Clank vs. Jak and Daxter, etc, etc.

I think the trick here is that people have to make a decision that involves their money and their time, and no matter what they do not want to feel like they made anything but the absolute best decision. You'll notice that the majority of these people only actually own one console, and they are more interested in defending their own decision than they are actually commenting on the quality of the product that they have purchased.

Personally, I use both Macs and PCs regularly (PC at work, Mac at home). I code on Macs, PCs, and most of the consoles. I use products by Microsoft and products by Apple. Whatever. I don't care who made the damn thing, I care about what I can get done with it. I don't own an Xbox because none of the exclusive titles are appealing enough for me to go out and buy it. I'll never buy a PC for my home use because I am approximately 17 times more efficient under MacOS (though I agree OS X has some serious flaws). I don't hate Microsoft, but I do find their software to be generally more aggravating than that of over vendors. If Microsoft Word had the Apple logo on it, I'd still be pissed off at the horrible UI.

There are zealots everywhere, and they are all crazy. Ignore them and maybe they will go away.

waka

Posted by: waka on January 27, 2004 04:37 PM

There are zealots everywhere, and they are all crazy. Ignore them and maybe they will go away.

Sigh...That's what we said about the German Socialists before the second world war. If only it were true.

Swing Heil!

Posted by: ragmana on January 27, 2004 09:36 PM

The thing that blows me away about the Xbox is that it is a 1.0 product and it's really good. That's very rare in the world of modern hardware and software.

One other thing that the Xbox did well that I hope that other console makers think about in the future is that EVERYTHING YOU NEED to start playing is RIGHT IN THE BOX. I'm sick of shelling out extra money for memory cards. Every game out there (with the exception of Pac Man vs.) requires a memory card to play but Sony and Nintendo continue to insist on selling them seperately. This results in, at best, consumers who are kind of annoyed that they have to pay even more money on top of the advertised price and (at worst) crying kids on Christmas who can't play their new Final Fantasy game out of the box.

Posted by: Snowmit on January 27, 2004 09:36 PM

"One other thing that the Xbox did well that I hope that other console makers think about in the future is that EVERYTHING YOU NEED to start playing is RIGHT IN THE BOX."

Amen, brother.

And you're right, for a first generation product it is quite sufficient. Sony pulled of the same coup with it's original PlayStation: from not our market to viable player with a great platform. Of course, they went on to *all* our market!

Posted by: san on January 28, 2004 04:28 PM

Sigh...That's what we said about the German Socialists before the second world war. If only it were true.

I seem to remember a saying about how the longer an internet argument gows on, the chance of someone being called a Nazi approaches 1

Posted by: Skwirl on January 28, 2004 07:11 PM

I wonder how long before Apple announces a gaming console.

Posted by: Calypso on January 28, 2004 10:51 PM


I wonder how long before Apple announces a gaming console.

circa 1996...

http://www.macgeek.org/museum/pippin/

waka

Posted by: waka on January 28, 2004 11:22 PM

waka: I called Steve Jobs last night -- ya know we're pals; I have his mobile number -- and asked him about this "Pippin" thing you mention. He said, "We never made one of those." Then I asked him about this PDA-type device that I've heard rumors Apple at one time sold under the name "Newton". "We never made one of those, either." he said.

So, this "Pippin" must merely be one of those wild Internet rumors that gets rolling and can't be stopped. You know how *that* goes.

[If Apple ever makes another gaming console, I'll eat my iPod -- with catsup.]

Posted by: san on January 29, 2004 02:14 AM

My uncle still uses his Newton... He swears up and down that it's the best PDA ever made, and refuses to upgrade. He also still uses his Apple Quicktake 100. The man is incurable.

Posted by: eli on January 29, 2004 11:04 AM
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gamegirladvance.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/447

Any links to weblogs that reference 'Hiking In The DMZ' from game girl advance will be listed here.


I've enjoyed:

hustler of culture

gewgaw - spelndid plaything

umami tsunami
Previous GGA Features
Archives
Category Archives
About GGA (15)
Academia (25)
Advertising (3)
Art (22)
Books (9)
Business (42)
Conferences (18)
Criticism (21)
Culture (17)
Design (4)
Economics (4)
Entertainment (19)
Events (64)
Experimental (32)
Fashion (25)
Features (18)
Food (2)
Fun (16)
Gender (25)
Humor (32)
Jane's Journal (71)
Journalism (27)
Law (18)
Marketing (10)
Military (2)
MMOG (33)
Movies (14)
Music (14)
News (15)
People (37)
Politics (41)
Preview (4)
Research (12)
Review (4)
Scandal! (2)
Sex (12)
Society (44)
Technology (22)
Television (4)
Theory (25)
Travel (1)
Trends (25)
Upcoming Releases (12)
Web (12)
WTF? (28)
GameGirlAdvance 2003. All material copyright by author.
Website design by Jane Pinckard. Mascot design by Mike Krahulik.
Reprinting for commercial purposes by permission only. Reprinting for educational purposes with attribution only.