Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
January 27, 2004
Hiking In The DMZ
I thought that some GGA readers might find interesting a recent public spectacle on MacRumors, a site, as the moniker boldly suggests, dedicated to news and rumors about Apple's Mac platform and the company's peripheral products and services, as well as the technologies behind these items. A news item discussion about Xbox 2 and possible 65 nanometer process IBM microprocessors or some such double-E nonsense -- apologies to EE track students and professionals; you people are a cut above, really -- quickly devolved into a console wars thread replete with thinly veiled, censor-evading expletives in the vein of "Xbox is sh**!" and "GameCube is for p**sies!" Being a Mac site, Microsoft's Xbox caught the bulk of incoming heavy weapons fire, but PlayStation 2 and Nintendo's signature console did not escape unscathed. Two points about this lengthy combative discussion amazed me: one, the allegiance to a particular console is so great that individuals can't see the strengths and weaknesses of all currently shipping models; and secondly, the notion that just because one does not prefer their computer operating system software, Microsoft is incapable of producing revolutionary or even valuable evolutionary products. For my part, I am a Mac user. A dedicated Mac user. I'm not comfortable using Windows. This may have to do with the fact that I have always been a Mac user, or possibly because Windows is sh**! Regardless, from the moment I unpacked my Xbox -- a few precious minutes of delicious excitement -- I was, the overall size, weight and unspectacular aesthetics notwithstanding, greatly impressed with the device as a gaming platform. Superior graphics; hard drive for capacious storage; adequate controller -- though I prefer the S-type model; expansion capability for DVD movie playback; Halo; the whole works. And this from a company that had no prior track record in mass producing consumer electronics hardware. Microsoft did a few smart things with Xbox. They built a viable, even superior, gaming console from off-the-shelf parts, structured from the ground up a process for mass producing these devices, and they bought Bungie and with it Halo: instant killer app. Xbox Live, in my opinion, is vastly superior to the almost nonexistent online capabilities of GameCube and the discordant functions of same on PS2 -- both Japanese models requiring additional hardware if not subscription fees. This is not to say that I don't have a healthy fondness for my GameCube and PlayStation 2, but Xbox is hardly a lame dog and indeed often dominates much of my play time. What strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess. And all this carping issued forth from a blurb about a rumored new computer chip design... Posted by San at January 27, 2004 03:57 AM | TrackBackComments
What strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess. That may be how Mac users see themselves, but the rest of the world sees them a little differently. Mac heads have always had a tendency to fall into a reality distortion field... I used to be a Mac user (learned C programming on a Mac Plus way back when) but now primarily use Linux and it's great fun to see my family (Mac-users, all) start frothing at the mouth any time I praise Microsoft. Mac users may think they are rational but they are nothing of the sort. And you know what? Microsoft Windows is not all that bad. Posted by: eli on January 27, 2004 08:41 AMIf there were no Mac OS X -- or no Mac before that -- I would use Windows, or Linux or Solaris or whatever. But there is a Mac OS X and it is, in my opinion, much better than Windows. But, no, Windows is not all that bad. There's not a thing I do with my Mac that I could not in some way do with Windows; I just do it somewhat differently on the Mac. Yes, unfortunately in any issue of fealty, "discerning and enlightened" is often merely synonymous with "zealot". Posted by: san on January 27, 2004 09:52 AMya gotta understand something (as i post from a giant macintosh) - evangelists of any stripe come off as looney to the uninitiated. mac evangelists are much like scientologist evangelists, imo; frothy and and struggling to convince themselves the few thousand they just laid out was worth it. Posted by: dhex on January 27, 2004 10:57 AMI thought Apple took a serious step backwards from usability when they released OSX. Previously their main selling point had been the OS's intuitiveness. Now they have dumped intuitiveness and are advertising the fact that their boxes are "faster" than Wintel boxes. (Remember all the zealotry about "Mhz doesn't mean anything"?) Microsoft and Apple have almost switched places, advertising and focus-wise. This discussion makes me want to dig the Mac Plus out of the closet and play a game of Dark Castle... Posted by: eli on January 27, 2004 11:01 AMI am a former Mac sysadmin, but now use PCs because everyone else does, and I have no mind of my own. I doseem to have somewhat of an IBM Thinkpad fetish as well - I'm on #5. I kinda view the Mac/PC debate in a similar vein to the San Francisco/LA debate - everyone in San Francisco hates LA, and everyone in LA thinks San Francisco is a fine place to visit, and doesn't really care what they think. Posted by: drew on January 27, 2004 11:13 AMWhat strikes me as entirely ludicrous, not to mention embarrassing for a group of individuals -- Mac users -- who roundly consider themselves a discerning, enlightened bunch, is the complete lack of critical thinking when assessing Xbox and the assignment of condign appreciation for the exceptional qualities it does possess. Please be careful not to lump all Mac users together. What you are witnessing is Internet Zealotry Syndrome, available for all products on message boards across the web. Macs vs. PCs, Xbox vs. PS2 vs. GameCube, Ratchet and Clank vs. Jak and Daxter, etc, etc. I think the trick here is that people have to make a decision that involves their money and their time, and no matter what they do not want to feel like they made anything but the absolute best decision. You'll notice that the majority of these people only actually own one console, and they are more interested in defending their own decision than they are actually commenting on the quality of the product that they have purchased. Personally, I use both Macs and PCs regularly (PC at work, Mac at home). I code on Macs, PCs, and most of the consoles. I use products by Microsoft and products by Apple. Whatever. I don't care who made the damn thing, I care about what I can get done with it. I don't own an Xbox because none of the exclusive titles are appealing enough for me to go out and buy it. I'll never buy a PC for my home use because I am approximately 17 times more efficient under MacOS (though I agree OS X has some serious flaws). I don't hate Microsoft, but I do find their software to be generally more aggravating than that of over vendors. If Microsoft Word had the Apple logo on it, I'd still be pissed off at the horrible UI. There are zealots everywhere, and they are all crazy. Ignore them and maybe they will go away. waka Posted by: waka on January 27, 2004 04:37 PMThere are zealots everywhere, and they are all crazy. Ignore them and maybe they will go away. Sigh...That's what we said about the German Socialists before the second world war. If only it were true. Swing Heil! Posted by: ragmana on January 27, 2004 09:36 PMThe thing that blows me away about the Xbox is that it is a 1.0 product and it's really good. That's very rare in the world of modern hardware and software. One other thing that the Xbox did well that I hope that other console makers think about in the future is that EVERYTHING YOU NEED to start playing is RIGHT IN THE BOX. I'm sick of shelling out extra money for memory cards. Every game out there (with the exception of Pac Man vs.) requires a memory card to play but Sony and Nintendo continue to insist on selling them seperately. This results in, at best, consumers who are kind of annoyed that they have to pay even more money on top of the advertised price and (at worst) crying kids on Christmas who can't play their new Final Fantasy game out of the box. Posted by: Snowmit on January 27, 2004 09:36 PM"One other thing that the Xbox did well that I hope that other console makers think about in the future is that EVERYTHING YOU NEED to start playing is RIGHT IN THE BOX." Amen, brother. And you're right, for a first generation product it is quite sufficient. Sony pulled of the same coup with it's original PlayStation: from not our market to viable player with a great platform. Of course, they went on to *all* our market! Posted by: san on January 28, 2004 04:28 PMSigh...That's what we said about the German Socialists before the second world war. If only it were true. I seem to remember a saying about how the longer an internet argument gows on, the chance of someone being called a Nazi approaches 1 Posted by: Skwirl on January 28, 2004 07:11 PMI wonder how long before Apple announces a gaming console. Posted by: Calypso on January 28, 2004 10:51 PM
circa 1996... http://www.macgeek.org/museum/pippin/ waka Posted by: waka on January 28, 2004 11:22 PMwaka: I called Steve Jobs last night -- ya know we're pals; I have his mobile number -- and asked him about this "Pippin" thing you mention. He said, "We never made one of those." Then I asked him about this PDA-type device that I've heard rumors Apple at one time sold under the name "Newton". "We never made one of those, either." he said. So, this "Pippin" must merely be one of those wild Internet rumors that gets rolling and can't be stopped. You know how *that* goes. [If Apple ever makes another gaming console, I'll eat my iPod -- with catsup.] Posted by: san on January 29, 2004 02:14 AMMy uncle still uses his Newton... He swears up and down that it's the best PDA ever made, and refuses to upgrade. He also still uses his Apple Quicktake 100. The man is incurable. Posted by: eli on January 29, 2004 11:04 AMjpb ppyt psycholog zdrowa żywność nieruchomości projektowanie stron agencja reklamowa soczewki kontaktowe nauka angielskiego agroturystyka opony klimatyzacja domy opieki akupunktura hydraulik projektowanie wnętrz soha jpk paa ki wypadki tfrd jh sw jft pp fdr Posted by: outsider on April 11, 2006 08:29 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |