Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
November 10, 2004
Business: it's just a game.
Yesterday I heard a story on NPR Marketplace about a new book, Got Game, from Mitchell Wade and John C. Beck.(Note to future game-technology authors: please please please come up with new catch phrases for titles. Don't try to be cute. It's all been done.) In a brief interview, Wade talked about how video game training has influenced the next generation of business people and entrepreneurs. Some of his research sounds interesting and worthy of further investigation. For example, game-raised workers exhibit: 1. Willingness to take measured risks - gamers learn this innately long before they get to business school. 2. Different way of interacting with others. For example, less respect for hierarchy and seniority. In game world, anyone can be beaten by a 12-year-old. Gamers tend to respect ability, not seniority. 3. Seriousness about expertise, and being rewarded for that expertise. No matter how many times you fail in a game, if you REALLY want it, you CAN beat it. No doubt a helpful attitude in business. One other thing Wade emphasized was that these characteristics were found in their research pool regardless of whether the subjects play games currently; the important thing for the data seems to be that they had played games. Posted by jane at November 10, 2004 12:18 PM | TrackBackComments
"3. Seriousness about expertise, and being rewarded for that expertise. No matter how many times you fail in a game, if you REALLY want it, you CAN beat it." Unless they played the original Battletoads or Fallout 2 v 1.0 (the retail release). ;) Posted by: Bowler on November 10, 2004 08:37 PMI'm such a nerd, but the respect for hierarchy and seniority thing sounds fascinating. I work in a HUGE company IT company and i support a sales team - all of the reps are young (under 35, easy). They basically cold call, but i wonder if the same influence that causes people to respect ability vs seniority allows these reps to more easily interact with CEOs and such - in that they are not intimidated by them in the same way that previous generations would be. These guys pick up the phone and call into companies all day long, 100's of companies. They are generalists as well, so they probably fall into the seriousness about expertise as well, they know what they are talking about, and respect their customers if they do too. Interesting Jane, thanks! Posted by: Robyn on November 11, 2004 12:41 PMFunny - there's been a lot of talk about how the business of games isn't exactly open to questioning authority, or taking measured risks these days... As back-channel chat about quality of life issues becomes increasingly public, perhaps the entertainment software industry will... rub off on itself? Posted by: roBin on November 11, 2004 06:12 PM
There's now a post on Slashdot about a possible class action suit against EA. Posted by: ElusiveSpoon on November 12, 2004 11:28 AM
business is just a game. the reason that most people do not recognize it as such is that there is no reset button or savegame to return to, and money loss is possible, and so it appears to be risky and stressful and less fun. on November 15, 2004 02:14 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |