I've enjoyed:
Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
November 12, 2004
Lawsuit Man! With the Incredible Power to Sue.
For those of you who haven’t seen, Marvel is suing NC Soft over City of Heroes. According to Marvel, since players can feasibly (and to be fair from my experience with the game, often do) use the character creation tool to make close facsimiles to Marvel heroes it both violates Marvel’s copyright and hurts their ability to create a Marvel-based on-line game. While I don’t think NC Soft can be blamed – they are rather strict with enforcing their terms of service, often forcing players to change copyrighted characters – it does raise an interesting point. What’s the line between player artistic freedom using character creation tools and copyright laws? Should NC Soft really be sued over something that they explicitly ask their players not to do? I’m not sure how much I dig Marvel suing NC Soft over what really boils down to fans of Marvel pretending to be Marvel superheroes without Marvel’s permission. Especially considering nearly none of the characters in their relatively corny comic book or their advertising resemble Marvel heroes. I am curious, however, to see how strict this causes NC Soft and other companies with intense character-creation tools to become. Comments
I'd be interested if this even makes it to court. There's no way to really enforce this. I mean, they'd have to ban the color green for skin and dark hair. Otherwise, hey, it's the Hulk! Posted by: bowler![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.gamegirladvance.com/nav-commenters.gif) on November 12, 2004 07:38 PM
besides, it's not NC Soft's problem that Marvel can't get their poop in a group to release their own game. Love the litigation business model. "Hey! That's a really good idea that I had but never got around to developing. I know, I'll sue!!" I wonder if when the game was in the development stage, someone from NC Soft contacted Marvel. Then for some reason, some dunderhead at Marvel choose to pass on the investment opportunity because computers are not in the strategic plan for a comic, ie paper-based, company. Sounds like management should start paying attention to videogame companies business model. So, from what I've just read, if you created a costume in CoH that is the same color scheme as say, Iron Man. Red and Gold, and called yourself Iron /\/\4n, someone from NC Soft would contact you and say that you must change your character? Wow. That's insane. Posted by: ironmonkey on November 13, 2004 09:24 AM
I don't think it's per se insane that NCSoft would review character names: the Everquest character creation process included screening and approval for player-chosen names. I actually wish that more MMORPG's would be active about that: there are way too many (i.e., more than zero) "Sephiroth" and "Cloud" variants in FFXI, for example, and dozens of other ridiculous names. What is ridiculous is the legal action itself. I'll go farther and say that a cultural producer like Marvel who, in a sense, effectively colonizes the subconscious of postmodernity with its names, images, and concepts cannot then balk at the ubiquity and after-life of those ideas and images. Popular culture is just that - popular, part of the daily fabric of life for all members of that society. The miserly, grasping need to control that very thing by whose diffusion you profitted so richly is absurd. Posted by: William Huber on November 13, 2004 11:10 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
I've enjoyed:
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |