Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
January 31, 2005
Bad Games and the Women Who Love Them
A few weeks ago I was deeply immersed in playing Summoner, an early RPG by THQ that I bought around the same time I got my first PS2. I've finished the game, oh, maybe three times already. And I mean really finished it - completed every side quest and maxed out my characters (well, nearly). As the classic Evil Summoner FAQ eloquently describes, the game itself is a piece of shit. Badly designed, badly written (except for one mildly interesting plot twist), frustrating, and inflexible. "God, I hate this game," I'd mutter while guiding my clumsy characters through yet another prolongued FedEx quest. "You say that all the time," my boyfriend observed. "So why do you play?"
I think I need a self-help manual to break the destructive cycle. Maybe it is like being in a bad relationship. You keep thinking, this time it'll be better! Or the problems are so numerous that fixing them at least give you something to do. Are good relationships boring? It's just a theory. But obviously my addictions have to be bad in the right way. Some bad games are simply unplayable. Summoner is bad in a way that I still found interesting, because I could make a game of exploiting some of the badness. The enemy AI, for instance, is so moronic you can cast a fire spell and the Frozen Bone Knight or whatever it is happily stands there basking in the fire, burning to death, unaware of its mortal danger. That's fun. And each time I played the game, I collected new information about how to better maximize my character's stats. When I first played through, I didn't know how to use Fleece. I just gave her a bow and had her as a ranged attacker as my other characters entered melee or did magic. A bow's damage, even with the higher-level bows like the Bow of Lynnai, is negligible against the serious monster. There's no way to enhance the damage either. So I thought of her as unimportant in melle combat, only useful in sneaky situations, or for opening locks, or stuff like that - secondary skills. Which is too bad, because the rogue/thief class is my favorite to play. But the second time I played through, I discovered that properly optimized Fleece is hands down the best character in the game, even in face-to-face combat. Yes, her hit points aren't great and she can't handle the more damage-dealing weapons, unless you waste Skill Points in Heavy Arms, but she has the unbeatable combination of Backstab and Trip. Trip an enemy, then run around and Backstab it - works every time. Instant kill! It feels like cheating because it's so easy. Then I would challenge myself. Can I get through this area using only the magic user, Rosalind? Or using only Fleece? Or, for a real challenge, using only the men? That would take lots of strategy and planning ahead. And finally, I'd optimize the quests themselves. The surfeit of FedEx quests as I mentioned above can keep you running around town and between towns forever, slowed down by interminable loading times and random encounters on the map. But if you know where everything is and what everyone wants, I found it satisfying the organize my expedition to perfect the reward vs. time spent ratio. I felt a strange sense of victory over the game itself. Ha, THQ, you tried to make me run around but I know what to do, you can't make me sit through your stupid level designs. No doubt there are better ways to spend my time. Way better. I know. But I have to admit that there is a strange satisfaction in playing a "bad" game well. This activity probably should not enthrall me quite to the extent that it does. It is, you may well say, a waste of time. And I agree with you. I got to the final battle of the game this time round and stopped. It'll probably be a year before I pick it up again. I hope. But we live in an imperfect world. Maybe a bad game is just teaching me to optimize what I've got, to make the best out of a situation out of my control. Or maybe I just have a real problem. **** If you want to check out the best bad game yourself here's the PC version. Buying it through us gives us a little money that helps keep us going and keeps you good and distracted. Comments
three times! that's psychotic... i love it ;) I've often considered making "king's field" my bad game of choice... I should really pick that foul thing up! Posted by: ryan on January 31, 2005 08:22 PM
I own that game. The original PS2 issue, bought at the same time the PS2 was launched (back when I was an early adopter). The game got almost universally panned, but I didn't mind playing it and finishing it. Now if you want bad games one irrationally keeps going back to, mine would have to be Tsugunai. The game is as boring as it can get, and hellishly hard to finish. But I'll be damned if I don't still get the itch to play it every once in a while even with shinier toys around. Posted by: turandot on January 31, 2005 08:25 PM
*raises her hand and says: I'm Robyn... and i play PN 03.* Yes. It's terrible. And repetitive. And pretty boring... but... i just had to have it... and occasionally, i just have to play it. And i dont kid myself. I know it's bad. So strange. Posted by: Girl_from_Mars on February 1, 2005 06:42 AM
Playing bad games and buying really cheap games from the bargain bin are always tempting to me. I always prefer to buy the half-assed Game Boy edition of a game (this was truer back when games like Mortal Kombat came out on every system) before I buy the console version, simply because I think that I want the worst possible version of a game. While you think of it as being in an abusive relationship, I think of it as being in a relationship with someone you know you're better than. There's a sick sense of compassion, because this poor game is awful, but you're giving it the love that other people just can't give. Other folks might find the game's graphics wanting, its polygons bland, its dialoge predictable, its quests dull. But the fact that you give it the time of day not only makes you a better person (because in some way you're also giving the poor saps that spent a solid chunk of their lives making it), but it raises the level of the game. To put it another way...bad games are like Sloth from "The Goonies," and I'm Chunk, goddammit. Posted by: Mike on February 1, 2005 07:49 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |