Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
March 04, 2005
Questions for Molyneux
Hello my smart readers, I'm interviewing Peter Molyneux next week. What are some of the things you'd want to know? It's always tough to think of questions he hasn't already been asked a thousand times, like "where did you get the idea for x game"; so if you have some interesting questions you've been mulling over, let me know! Posted by jane at March 04, 2005 07:37 AM | TrackBackComments
Here's my question... Despite wonderful previews and amazing press coverage, both Black & White and Fable were heavily criticized both by the public and by the game media for being too boring and not meeting the goals of open-endedness that were promised. Could you comment on the fact that your most recent major releases seem to be a case of biting off more than you can chew? Do you think the gaming press reacted fairly after you promised certain features in your games and then had to cut back due to developmental restrictions? You're also one of the first developers to publicly apologize for a game gone wrong. As lead designer, did you feel it was your fault that Fable didn't come out as planned? If not, why apologize for what could have been money problems or publisher pressures? Finally, Will The Movies ever see the light of day? Posted by: Mike on March 4, 2005 08:20 AM
Not to make all the questions to Molyneux pointed or anything, I mean, I've spent house and hours and hours of my life playing his games. Populous and Powermonger are two of the best games ever made in my opinion. However! It seems to me that lately Molyneux has been more concept driven than gameplay driven - which seems like a stark contrast with his earlier work. This brings up an important question... Why has he turned his focus to high concept titles rather than refining gameplay fundamentals? Does he make a distinction between concept and gameplay, or allow gameplay to arise from the implementation of a concept? Now that I think about it, I'm curious as to which method he used when developing Syndicate. Did he say "Let's envision a future where companies are run like the mafia and have gangland style turf wars?" or "Let's use a cyberpunk style future to emphasize real time squad-based tactical combat?" Posted by: skyknyt on March 4, 2005 08:51 AM
"So Peter, are you French, or British?" ;) Posted by: bowler on March 4, 2005 11:26 AM
"Do you have any advice for aspiring game developers who wish to be the next Peter Molyneux?" "How much coding do you personally do on your games?" "How did you get to be where you are today?" I could talk with Peter all day. :) Posted by: DaveKap on March 4, 2005 02:37 PM
bowler: hahaha Posted by: jane on March 4, 2005 04:03 PM
Did you regard yourself as a particular game fan before advances in technology made video games possible? If so, which games and designers particularly influenced you? Are there any designers of non-video games or other public figures whose talents you would like to be able to use in game development somehow? Posted by: jiggery_pokery on March 6, 2005 03:21 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (24) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (18) Design (6) Economics (5) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (15) Music (17) News (15) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (13) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (45) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |