Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
March 13, 2005
Busted flat in Baton Rouge. Or Darnassus.
I learn this morning via Joystiq that Blizzard has graduated to the virtual afterlife a largish chunk of World of Warcraft players who've been farming gold in the game world and selling it out here in wetworld for the coin of the realm(s). Thus inflames the million-voice choir with the seed of a debate over whether or not Blizzard should be allowed to do this. Nonsense. Of course they should be allowed to do it. Blizzard has the absolute right to do what they wish with their game world. This includes canceling player accounts for in-game conduct that they do not like. This includes canceling the whole game if they so desire. I thought we had worked out all this philosophical intrigue with Sony's EverQuest. For the avid WoWer, it should by now be quite clear: You play at the pleasure of Blizzard; learn to live with it. That's not to say this is necessarily a wise business move. Indeed the parental urge of the game's developers to curtail creative and perhaps unforeseen uses of their world may prohibit them from making considered decisions. Any game has the potential to go stale, and I would argue that it's just a matter of time before all games go stale. People doing weird things in World of Warcraft of course may cause some trouble, but they are also working for Blizzard, not for free, but actually paying Blizzard to work. Innovative use of the game world keeps things fresh. Even if it's annoying. Not all of it will benefit the game world, of course, but if it keeps you coming back out of delight or sheer frustration, it enhances the marketability of the game. And this ultimately benefits Blizzard. If you did a little gold farming on the side and today discovered you no longer exist in Azeroth, go buy yourself a fresh copy of WoW, load up on some more game hours, and get back to it. This time, try not to get caught. Posted by San at March 13, 2005 07:47 AM | TrackBackComments
I just think it's dumb when they announced their policy back on 12/10 ("Selling World of Warcraft In-Game Content for Real Money") and these people didn't think there would be any follow through on Blizzard's part. As for whether it's a wise business move, I think people buying stuff outside of the game is likely to piss off more people than those that are going to get bored and farming would be the only thing to keep them interested. Posted by: squagle on March 13, 2005 09:37 AM
"playing at the pleasure of blizzard," that whole notion kind of reminds me of the little shit spastic dungeon master who arbitrarily tore up my high level character when i was in ninth grade. i am almost 40 now, and i still feel like slapping that bastard around. ok maybe these players violated the TOS. i probably do every time i log in, i wouldn't know i haven't read them, just like i imagine NO ONE ELSE HAS. if they got kicked without warning, then i would say it is completely unwarranted. if they were individually notified, then that might be another matter. it's still awkward, the whole deal, because in effect it is a regulation of players' behavior OUTSIDE of the game. farming gold isn't the infraction, it's selling it on ebay. Posted by: eric on March 13, 2005 12:57 PM
Here's the problem - Lineage 2. FFXI. Ultima Online. Everquest. What do all these games have in common? Their economies have been decimated by IGE/MMOG Money Sellers. In FFXI and Lineage 2, it is literally impossible to progress without buying Gold with Cash. And doing so inflates the economy, so you have to buy more. So, basically, you have to pay a third party real money in order to afford to play at all. You can watch the lines of folks in FFXI, all dragoons, standing around a spawn point, prepared to use "jump" to get the first hit, and thus, the loot. All in the same guilds, they go and sell the items at auction for absurd prices. To afford the prices, you have to pay. It's ridiculous. Lineage 2, the best equipment drops at a tiny, tiny, tiny drop rate. Yet you need this stuff to compete in PVP - since everyone else already has it, and bought it with gold purchased from IGE. And of course, it's the IGE gold sellers that generally are on all the time, and therefore probably got the drop. I don't think Blizzard banning people is going to be the end of the gold selling business, or ruin their game. Hopefully it will prolong the life of the game's economy by that much more! Posted by: skyknyt on March 13, 2005 05:04 PM
Farming isn't outside the game as it's addressed in the terms of service (aka "the rules of the game"). In principal I'd prefer that when we play a game together we both follow the same rules. It's not that I care about this specific issue as much as the meta-issue of a player agreeing to a set of rules for a game and then electing to not follow the agreement. I'd be happy to see a soccer player get a red card for swearing at the ref and I'm happy to see these folks get their accounts banned. If the rules didn't cover this then it would be a totally different story and I'd probably be on the side of the farmers. -Gamegeek Posted by: Gamegeek on March 15, 2005 03:32 PM
are they too busy revoking farmer accounts to finish Starcraft: Ghost? I have had that b*tch ordered from Amazon for almost TWO YEARS. Date: Jun 19 2003 Items not yet shipped: on March 17, 2005 01:27 PM
(and i know, i m just being tounge in cheek. Blah blah blah, redevelopment, blah blah fighting with studios, blah blah. Gimme my game.) Posted by: Girl_from_Mars on March 17, 2005 01:30 PM
Heh, you should read EVE's TOU. They basically say, straight out, that they can cancel your account for any reason without giving you any reason. Not sure if that is entirely legal or not (at least in Canada/U.S.), but they can, will and have cancelled accounts for selling their property on EBay. IMHO, it IS their game world, therefore it IS their rules, they do warn you... In the terms of use, items 11-13: on March 21, 2005 11:45 AM
tworzenie stron tworzenie stron ; ogłoszenia nieruchomości ogłoszenia nieruchomości ; reklama w internecie reklama w internecie ; sm ; ma ; mpa ; apteki warszawa apteki warszawa ; jiddu krishnamurti jiddu krishnamurti ; stomatologia warszawa stomatolog warszawa ; opony opony ; mieszkania warszawa mieszkania warszawa ; jk ; freud ; klimatyzacja klimatyzacja ; soczewki kontaktowe soczewki kontaktowe ; projektowanie stron projektowanie stron ; nieruchomości warszawa nieruchomości warszawa Posted by: outsider on August 17, 2006 10:25 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (25) Advertising (3) Art (22) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (17) Design (4) Economics (4) Entertainment (19) Events (64) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (2) Fun (16) Gender (25) Humor (32) Jane's Journal (71) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (14) Music (14) News (15) People (37) Politics (41) Preview (4) Research (12) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (44) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |