Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
April 14, 2005
PSP Glamour: Will Anybody Care That You Liked Gaming Before It Was Cool?
The DS was made to change the way that games are played. If the PSP changes anything about the way games are played, it's that now when you play, you might actually look hot.
And that's what's so odd, really. I mean, yes the PSP is a sleek little device. It fits into the style of the photographs, but, I mean, they're so posed and awkward. It's like they decided to do Gothic Lolita night on The Price is Right. It's not really sexy or mysterious, it's just silly. When it comes down to it, the best glamour shot of a PSP wasn't even made by Sony marketing. It was made by some girl. I linked to the original picture from Kotaku a few days ago. Much to my surprise, the girl writes for gaming blog-thing RedAssedBaboon under the name of Hatsumi. She has in fact written about "the picture," finally proving that ours isn't the only website where women will fondle gaming hardware and then reflect on it.
This is, of course, ridiculous. Random guy on the street with a GBA SP is no more likely to be anything like me than random guy on the street with a PSP. It's great that gaming can be trendy, and that the 300 pound guy on the train the other day and Paris Hilton are both PSP owners. Maybe now there'll be some demand for game-related clothing that breaks the basement-casual standard? After all, if there's one thing we gamers know how to do, it's play (and pwn) well with others, and the pool of "others" just got a whole lot bigger. Right now, gamers are coming out of the basement, into the lime-light, and you know what they look like? They look like me. They look like you. They look like Hatsumi. But they're all here because they love games. No doubt we'll get to have arguments over who was a gamer "before it was cool," but if it means that we can argue over a friendly wi-fi deathmatch, then I'm looking forward to such inanities. Posted by ClockworkGrue at April 14, 2005 06:07 PM | TrackBackComments
Love it... Have only just caught up with this PSP licking thing and had to post a link to your piece on my blog 'Darkmatters' (along with the licking photo). Yes, that's a PSP in my pocket darling - you're not that cute!! Posted by: Dark Matt on April 15, 2005 03:22 AM
GameDaily has a related story drawing an analogy between Microsoft's recent alliance with MTV and Kevin Federline's ditching of his wife and kids to marry Brittney. I thought it was a particularly apt analogy in relation to this piece. Plus it starts to reveal some of the reasons and implications of games going mainstream. Posted by: Clubberjack on April 15, 2005 10:45 AM
(ex-gf, not wife...and she was pregnant w/ his only child at the time) But yes, I've noticed this happening too. As the article points out, the gaming press gets invited to events and so on, of course, but we're seen now as very niche and somewhat geeky. I was at an event recently, and overheard a panicky flurry among the PR folks there: "Wired is here! So go get them on a game right now!" There's a whole different attitude to consumer press people. As the article also points out, this is natural - Wired is going to read way more people (and they cover many fewer games, so each game is super-important) Can games press exist as they are? Posted by: jane on April 15, 2005 11:29 AM
On Jane's comment: >Can games press exist as they are? Why not? I guess that the hardcore gamers will be a more important market than the mainstream for a while longer yet. And let's face it, even if you're a mainstream buyer looking for information on slightly less well-known games, chances are that you'll go to a dedicated source of news/reviews. Sure, people will read a GTA review in Wired, but if you're trying to pick a good RTS for your 12-year-old cousin that costs under $20, your only real option is the traditional gaming press. Not sure if this analogy is valid or not, but Variety co-exists just fine with the movie review column in the New York Times. Different purpose, different audiences. And people, I'd like to note that we can't have it both ways. Either we embrace our gaming geek culture fully (love and cherish our a cappella performers of old-skool game theme music), or we embrace our role as the new arbiters (mascots?) of cool (stop b*****ing and moaning about gaming going mainstrem). Posted by: JamesJ on April 16, 2005 02:26 PM
While I admit I will mourn the loss of that unique geekery, the emergence of gaming into the mainstream should help us. Think about it, recently we have been arguing louder and louder that gaming is an art form and should be considered so. Popularizing in this way will likely move it in that direction. That's the way it worked with books, movies, tv...et al. Besides, perhaps we wont really lose our uniqueness, the hard core movie watchers, music listeners, book readers all get their own cliques and places to hang out. Will game stores gain the slightly intimidating 'cool factor' that places like record stores have so long had? Posted by: Phincus on April 16, 2005 03:21 PM
isn't the main reason for the funkiness of the PSP the iPod? I was under the impression Sony are upset at how "chic" the iPod has become, so they're trying to "outchic" Apple... However, I hope the PSP licking thing doesn't get out of hand like the sidetalking Ngage payouts ;) Posted by: Funky J on April 18, 2005 07:28 PM
zertifizierung in Russland export on December 31, 2006 12:05 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (24) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (18) Design (6) Economics (5) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (15) Music (17) News (15) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (13) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (45) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |