Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
October 11, 2006
Pink - It's Not Just for Games
I was reading my news this morning when I came across Pink Magazine off the Forbes site. What. the. fuck. First of all, the generic name "Pink" says absolutely nothing about the content of the magazine except that it's targetted oh-so-subtly at women. But what sort of women? Girls? Is it fashion? Is it about the many shades of our gender's favorite color? Carly Fiorina is so fucking happy right now - finally, something that she can relate to. If only Patricia Dunn had this before she made her little boo boo! Secondly, it irritates me that Forbes is now implicitly saying that women have a "special" place to go to that is not Forbes.com. Forbes.com publishes sexist articles describing what terrible spouses educated "career women" make for the executive male. Forbes.com is clearly not for women. Except that it was, once. I used to enjoy all the career features, particularly, which could appeal both to men and women. We all have issues with finding fulfullment in work, with dealing with difficult bosses. Once in a while there was a feature like "100 Most Powerful Women" or a feature that described more specifically the challenges of being female in the workplace, which I imagine was just as valuable for men to read as for women. After all, we're all in this together, right? We all need to learn how to get along. Look at this random article I picked up off Pink: When and Why to Sell Your Company. A good idea for a feature, I thought - I would like to have my own company one day, and this is something I will need to consider. Reading the one-page article I learned that I would want to sell my company if 1) I wanted to spend more time with my kids 2) If I wanted to spend time traveling with my kids and 3) If I'm really not cut out for the harsh business of running a company and I want to move into a more nurturing role serving clients and making them happy. How much more fulfilling all of these are for a woman! There's nothing in here about moving on to start a new company, about when the market is ripe to sell a company; it's a pure fluff piece that celebrates the ultra-feminine. Now look at the "Art of the Business Lunch." Apparently women are naturally good at this - we're born hostesses! And we love to serve! I love number 8: When dining with a male, avoid misunderstandings by taking a colleague. What the fuck - now we need chaperones for business lunches? If an exec you arrange a business lunch with thinks "something else" is going on, then either you failed to communicate, he's a pig, or your skirt is too short. I'm not saying that there isn't a place for a publication that serves women in business; and I think something that did that seriously would be successful. But I also think Forbes could have done that ably, if they wanted to. "Pink" is a joke and frankly, it makes me wonder if Forbes isn't deliberately trying to sabotage women in the workplace. "Pink" is the ghetto Forbes thinks women belong in. Posted by jane at October 11, 2006 10:26 AM | TrackBackComments
good lord. on October 11, 2006 11:01 AM
At first I thought the list of reasons to sell your business was a joke. I mean not all women that own a business have children. Also most women that have children and a business can manager their time where they can travel with their family and be with their children. Sometimes the reason they have their own business is to be able to be with their children more and travel with them. Pink Magazine sounds like another lame a** way a publisher is trying to get into the women's market. Posted by: Char on October 11, 2006 09:22 PM
Blech. Posted by: CommanderTso on October 12, 2006 03:13 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
Archives
November 2007
October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (25) Advertising (3) Art (22) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (21) Culture (17) Design (4) Economics (4) Entertainment (19) Events (64) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (2) Fun (16) Gender (25) Humor (32) Jane's Journal (71) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (2) MMOG (33) Movies (14) Music (14) News (15) People (37) Politics (41) Preview (4) Research (12) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (44) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (25) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |