I've enjoyed:
Google GGA:
|
|
Links
Alice Taylor
Clint Hocking Costik Derek Daniels The Edge electro^plankton Gamasutra Game Critics GameDevBlog GameFAQs Game Jew Game Poets Society Game Set Watch Gamevideos.com Gewgaw Got Game? Grand Text Auto Grrl Gamer Henry Jenkins Heroine-Sheik IGDA Indie Game Jam Insert Credit Invisible City Julian Dibbell KillerBetties Kim Pallister Kongregate Kotaku Lost Garden Ludology Magic Box Margaret Robinson Matteo Bittanti Memory Card Ogre Cave Penny Arcade Raph Koster Reality Panic Serious Games Shiny Shiny Slash Dot Games Surfer Girl Terra Nova ToastyFrog Tokyopia Water Cooler Games Women Gamers Zen of Design
Thank You for Donating!
If you'd like to help keep GGA afloat, we thank you!
Mascot by Penny Arcade!
|
August 21, 2007
Selling a Review Score
This actually happened last year when I was at 1UP, because I remember the 1UP side of it - the publisher wanted to know what scores would be given, we refused to tell, they threaten to yank the exclusive, etc. The usual nonsense. And since I have many friends who used to work at IGN, I can also say I heard the story independently from them, as well. It's stinky! And I'm glad that stories like this are coming out in the open. I wish my friends who knew about it could speak more openly and less anonymously about it, but there is still such an old boys' network, and an informal blacklist too. That's something else that has to change about game journalism. In any case although I believe this story to be true it still only counts as hearsay, word against word, etc, and unless there were more evidence it's not really "newsworthy." Nevertheless the anecdote gives us a glimpse into how some people work the system. And... for hilarity's sake, since we are speaking of untrustworthy reviews: Worst Review Ever? Posted by jane at August 21, 2007 11:40 AM | TrackBackComments
Sorry to be spamming your blog today... I have a few thoughts here, none of which disagree with the article you linked to, but... Readers empower all this behavior, to a certain extent. Back when I was with Strategy Plus we were always struggling to compete with some of the less ethical mags. Why? Because they'd get all kinds of exclusives. We didn't, because we wouldn't play the game. But readers didn't care about how or why a magazine got exclusives; they just cared that they had them. Ditto reviews. We refused to review anything but shrink-wrapped product, so we were often 'scooped' by the mags that would review "gold masters" (which often weren't even really that far along). Is anyone reading this old enough to remember when PC Gamer reviewed (note: REVIEWED, not PREVIEWED) an early build of a space sim from SSI, and slagged it for being buggy (which, in its not-even-beta state, it was of course) and the buzz against the game was so strong that SSI killed the project? Did the readers care? Nope, they kept on subscribing... * * * Also, it would be nice to see the positive stories talked about too. Like an editor having to take a call from a screaming, ranting game publisher gunning for the hide of the reviewer who gave his latest game a bad review, and said editor backing the reviewer to the hilt. Then later taking the call from the magazine publisher who is upset because the game publisher called him next, threatening to pull all advertising, and still backing the reviewer. This kind of story happens all the time too, I'm sure. In particular back when you were reviewing anything that Jim Rose's company put out. :) But the readers never hear that kind of story either, and remain convinced that every reviewer out there is a shill. Which I think is tragic, since so many of them are passionate gamers trying to do honest reviews. Posted by: Pete S![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.gamegirladvance.com/nav-commenters.gif) on August 21, 2007 01:09 PM
I disagree, this is the worst game review ever: on August 21, 2007 02:36 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|
I've enjoyed:
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 Category Archives
About GGA (15) Academia (26) Advertising (3) Art (25) Books (9) Business (42) Conferences (18) Criticism (22) Culture (20) Design (6) Economics (6) Entertainment (19) Events (65) Experimental (32) Fashion (25) Features (18) Food (3) Fun (16) Gender (26) Humor (35) Jane's Journal (78) Journalism (27) Law (18) Marketing (10) Military (3) MMOG (33) Movies (16) Music (18) News (16) People (37) Politics (42) Preview (4) Research (14) Review (4) Scandal! (2) Sex (12) Society (47) Technology (22) Television (4) Theory (27) Travel (1) Trends (25) Upcoming Releases (12) Web (12) WTF? (28) |