« Meet the new games journalism, same as the old games journalism. | Main | Games to Warn »

03/22/2005

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

mk-1601

"Will we see an EA Girls division some day?"

thesims.ea.com

...

The people you describe buy and play games. Why are they not gamers? Does it only count if you write blogs about games too?

Casey

Um, I think that was the point of the first paragraph... that although these people don't identify themselves as hardcore gamers and they don't fit the usual profile of such, they are playing games a lot anyway, thus redefining and broadening the gaming demographic.

Casey

Um, I think that was the point of the first paragraph... that although these people don't identify themselves as hardcore gamers and they don't fit the usual profile of such, they are playing games a lot anyway, thus redefining and broadening the gaming demographic.

Ham

It seems somewhat obvious that is what EA's Role is.

In general the majority of Hollywood movies aren't very good, in fact most are pretty bad. But that doesn't stop the average movie viewer from consuming them by the bucket load.

And most average movie goer's couldn't care less about the finer details of cinema.

Most would never seek out an obscure film or go see a movie unless they had seen the mind shaking trailer on thier TV's, or the evening 'news' didn't do an editorial on it, or the newspaper didn't tell them to go see it.

However, they are definitely movie watchers and they are Hollywood's bread and butter; the Masses.

Someone's got to fill that roll in the game industry. EA looks to be the one. And like Hollywood, they will more than likely dominate the industry.

Foopy

"The sports games are solid, but gamers complain they're too simplistic, too easy, too copy-cat, too..."

Huh? Okay, this is kinda non-sequitur, but as a supposed "gamer" and non-sports-fan, I've always found sports games to be way too complicated and difficult. How is a single person supposed to keep track of like 10 people and a ball at the same time, let alone control half of those people?

I've spent hours with NFL2K and FIFA '96 and I still don't get it. But then again, I have trouble following the ball when I just watch a soccer game. Which may be why the only "sports" game I ever really enjoyed was the original NBA Jam--only having to control 2 people at a time is a lot easier on my brain (and the game's interface) than 5. And of course, even someone who despises basketball can appreciate watching a guy launch a slam-dunk from the other end of the court while his body is on fire.

Maybe I don't understand this genre, but frankly, I'm wondering how these gamers you mention think sports games are supposed to get any more complex or difficult--even my few friends who like sports prefer the simplicity of the original NES Tecmo Bowl to any of the recent football games put out by EA or Sega.

outsider

tworzenie stron tworzenie stron ; ogoszenia nieruchomoci ogoszenia nieruchomoci ; reklama w internecie reklama w internecie ; sm ; ma ; mpa ; apteki warszawa apteki warszawa ; jiddu krishnamurti jiddu krishnamurti ; stomatologia warszawa stomatolog warszawa ; opony opony ; mieszkania warszawa mieszkania warszawa ; jk ; freud ; klimatyzacja klimatyzacja ; soczewki kontaktowe soczewki kontaktowe ; projektowanie stron projektowanie stron ; nieruchomoci warszawa nieruchomoci warszawa

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to the mailing list!

* indicates required